sprockets Shelton's new Char: Hans It's just donuts by ItsJustMe 3D Printing Free model: USS Midnight Rodger Reynolds' 1950s Street Car Madfox's Pink Floyd Video Tinkering Gnome's Elephant
sprockets
Recent Posts | Unread Content
Jump to content
Hash, Inc. - Animation:Master

Rodney


Shelton

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hope everything is well, Rodney, for you and your family!

 

Rodney is in the Airforce, so he's probably part of the rescue help. He may be pretty busy for awhile. Hopefully, that's all that's going on with him in this terrible disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saw a documentation about Tschernobyl on TV and just hope that Rodney is not located in the north of the country.

 

Lets all pray that the technicians will be able to prevent the worst case scenario!

 

My thoughts are with all the poor people in Japan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder a bit, why you people don`t say anything here facing this fundamental nuclear supercatastrophy.

 

The problem in Japan is, that you cant get helpers to work in the falloutzone unlike Tschernobyl,

were they for example just ordered 500.000 of reservist soldiers to help.

So when the technicans will abandon the reactors or get killed by radioactivity, the other reactors are going to melt down

as well. At the moment three reactors are critical.

The fallout cloud will either go West at the moment to Alaska, Hawai, California, Canada or when the weather changes

go South and whole Japan will get contaminated.

 

I am dearly hoping for some kind of wonder but the measures they try at the moment appear quite helpless to me.

 

This is so terrible ,I don`t find the right words!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
just hope that Rodney is not located in the north of the country.

 

North but not at the point of devastation.

Power and communications are being restored which is important in determining who is safe and who is still missing.

My wife has some family still unaccounted for but that is to be expected given the extent of damage.

The Japanese will obviously be dealing with the effects for a long time but they are a very resourceful people.

 

Not sure what else can be said.

There is a lot of work to be done and those trained for this type of disaster are in the thick of things doing their best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Thanks for the concern.

 

I've no plans to go anywhere soon (plenty to keep us busy here) and if my family goes anywhere it'd be Tokyo.

We are where we need to be for now.

 

In the meantime, feel free to model and animate cool stuff. As I find time that'll give me something to look forward to. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm so relieved you're safe for now.

 

Which base are you at? Yokota? Misawa?

 

Are you involved in any of the efforts?

 

There is talk of rolling blackouts. Do you think your area will be affected?

 

An article on the reactor situation. It was recently described as Level 4 (localized radioactivity, usually involves deaths, although there have not yet been deaths as a result of the reactor). Chernobyl was level 7, 3-Mile Island was level 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • *A:M User*

It is funny how this forum can tie people together. The first thing I thought of when I saw the news of Japan, was of Rodney. You and your family are in our thoughts and prayers and support. I was relieved your name popped up. It is good to hear from you.

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Chris,

You'll get more and better news online than you would from me. (I saw some pretty good assessments on Fox News... youtube had the best/most timely videos)

Most of my news will be filtered through an optimistic and practical view.

 

I don't know much about the rolling blackouts. Power would have to restored first for that to happen and many from Sendai north don't have that yet. (Note: Many do) To be honest, I'm rather amazed that I'm online at all. You've got to love modern technology!

 

I'm stationed in Misawa where in an earthquake like this makes living in high rise towers quite an experience.

I'm fortunate. I just lost a little furniture.

 

As for recovery efforts, as a cop I am definitely involved.

 

With aftershocks still occurring and a lot of work to do I might disappear for awhile. One never knows when the next earthquake could occur.

As my sister knows all too well... "Rodney is okay. When you hear from him that's when you should be concerned."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For others here ...

 

It looks like Misawa Air Force Base is being used as a base for search-and-rescue relief efforts in Miyagi Prefecture about 250km to the south, which includes Sendai (one of the worst hit areas). Here is a newsletter from a day ago (almost 2 now) updating the occupants of the base what is going on, what the restrictions were, etc.

 

ETA: Arrival of rescue teams in Misawa AFB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I may have to rely on you all for the best information and links. :)

 

Update on my wife's immediate family who live in the devastated area near Sendai: They've finally reported in and are safe. Knowing them, they were probably unable to be reached because they were helping others less fortunate than themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

There is a song that comes to mind. A part of one verse goes as follows: "Mixtures of joy and sorrow, I daily do pass through."

 

There is incredible devastation but emergency services personnel live for the moments where someone is safely reunited with family and friends.

The Japanese will study the lessons learned from this, mourn those lost, rebuild their lives and then strive to better prepare themselves for the next earthquake.

The speed and intensity of this one caught a lot of people by surprise.

It's hard to prepare for something of this magnitude but we must.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a song that comes to mind. A part of one verse goes as follows: "Mixtures of joy and sorrow, I daily do pass through."

 

There is incredible devastation but emergency services personnel live for the moments where someone is safely reunited with family and friends.

The Japanese will study the lessons learned from this, mourn those lost, rebuild their lives and then strive to better prepare themselves for the next earthquake.

The speed and intensity of this one caught a lot of people by surprise.

It's hard to prepare for something of this magnitude but we must.

the Japanese are very resourceful people , they will climb back up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Hash Fellow

I've been so busy with projects for the last few weeks I haven't looked much at news but the videos out of Japan look very depressing now. I can't imagine how one even begins to clean that up or how one stops a meltdown once it has started.

 

Chernobyl created a wide stretch of land that is still uninhabitable but at least they had some spare land to move to. That won't be easy in Japan.

 

I'm glad you're OK, Rodney and hope you and your family can stay OK. Earthquake in a high-rise! Worst adventure ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chernobyl created a wide stretch of land that is still uninhabitable but at least they had some spare land to move to. That won't be easy in Japan.

 

I'm glad you're OK, Rodney and hope you and your family can stay OK. Earthquake in a high-rise! Worst adventure ever.

 

There are so many conflicting reports, but all reports say these reactors are of a different and safer design than Chernobyl. What is clear is that these reactors won't ever be usable again, due to the sea water now being pumped into them. What is not clear is how much radiation from the steam (explosions) will be released, but it sounds as if it will be significantly less than any Chernobyl explosion, and that any melt down (which is not inevitable) will be containable. Different experts will give different opinions, but many are not predicting anything like Chernobyl. Many predict that any radiation will dissipate quickly - due to the type of fuel/reactor.

 

here is one such more optimistic report

 

What is so astounding is that these highrises performed magnificently - strict building codes, and design that saved countless lives. Perhaps the rubble can be used to create "seawalls/barriers". Or for higher ground upon which to build anew.

 

I am so very thankful that Rodney and his family, and his wife's family are safe. I grieve for those who have lost their loved ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>that any melt down (which is not inevitable) will be containable

 

I really don`t want to sound too pesimistic, but it all seems to be a case of fate and luck from now on.

Nobody really seems to know, not even the experts at the site, what`s going on at the moment.

 

The only thing, that`s obvious is, that it gets worse every day.

 

As a big friend of Japan and its people, I am totally shaken here on the other side of the world. This is so bad!!!

Earthquake,Tsunami you could at least rebuild, nuclear radiation, I don`t know.

 

I am so sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rodney,

 

Good to hear you and your family are okay. I couldn't post in here earlier because of Internet connection but as soon as I heard of the devastating news on Friday evening my heart skipped a beat thinking about about you and your family and the people of Japan because I love Japan and their culture.

 

I've watched the videos of the devastation during and after and I couldn't help but think how there are people in there with families who lost their lives and loved ones. It's so sad and depressing to watch. The Japanese people really don't deserve this. My thoughts go out to all of those in Japan affected by this tragedy. To those who survive in this time of loss I hope they stay strong to face any uncertainties. Stay safe and I hope you and your family all the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those wondering, here's an excellent write-up on the situation at the nuclear plant (including explanations why this is nothing like Chernobyl) .

 

What is going on here?

 

In the aftermath of the recent earthquake and tsunami in Japan, two nuclear power stations on the east coast of Japan have been experiencing problems. They are the Fukushima Daiichi ("daiichi" means "number one") and Fukushima Daini ("number two") sites, operated by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (or TEPCO). Site one has six reactors, and site two has four. The problematic reactors are #1, #2, and #3 at site one, which are the oldest of the ten and were due to be decommissioned this year.

 

In short, the earthquake combined with the tsunami have impaired the cooling systems at these reactors, which has made it difficult for TEPCO to shut them down completely. Reactor #1 is now considered safe after crew flooded the reactor with sea water. Reactor #3 was starting this process as this was originally written (6:00PM CST/11:00PM GST on March 13th). Site crew began preparing to add sea water to reactor #2 around 7:30AM GMT on March 14th, if a cooling procedure does not work.

 

The four reactors at site two did not have their systems impaired and have shut down normally.

 

Can this cause a nuclear explosion?

 

No. It is physically impossible for a nuclear power station to explode like a nuclear weapon.

 

Nuclear bombs work by causing a supercritical fission reaction in a very small space in an unbelievably small amount of time. They do this by using precisely-designed explosive charges to combine two subcritical masses of nuclear material so quickly that they bypass the critical stage and go directly to supercritical, and with enough force that the resulting supercritical mass cannot melt or blow itself apart before all of the material is fissioned.

 

Current nuclear power plants are designed around subcritical masses of radioactive material, which are manipulated into achieving sustained fission through the use of neutron moderators. The heat from this fission is used to convert water to steam, which drives electric generator turbines. (This is a drastic simplification.) They are not capable of achieving supercritical levels; the nuclear fuel would melt before this could occur, and a supercritical reaction is required for an explosion to occur.

 

Making a nuclear bomb is very difficult, and it is completely impossible for a nuclear reactor to accidentally become a bomb. Secondary systems, like cooling or turbines, can explode due to pressure and stress problems, but these are not nuclear explosions.

 

Is this a meltdown?

 

Technically, yes, but not in the way that most people think.

 

The term "meltdown" is not used within the nuclear industry, because it is insufficiently specific. The popular image of a meltdown is when a nuclear reactor's fuel core goes out of control and melts its way out of the containment facility. This has not happened and is unlikely to happen.

 

What has happened in reactor #1 and #3 is a "partial fuel melt". This means that the fuel core has suffered damage from heat but is still largely intact. No fuel has escaped containment. Core #2 may have experienced heat damage as well, but the details are not known yet. It is confirmed that reactor #2's containment has not been breached.

 

How did this happen? Aren't there safety systems?

 

When the earthquakes in Japan occurred on March 11th, all ten reactor cores "scrammed", which means that their control rods were inserted automatically. This shut down the active fission process, and the cores have remained shut down since then.

 

The problem is that even a scrammed reactor core generates "decay heat", which requires cooling. When the tsunami arrived shortly after the earthquake, it damaged the external power generators that the sites used to power their cooling systems. This meant that while the cores were shut down, they were still boiling off the water used as coolant.

 

This caused two further problems. First, the steam caused pressure to build up within the containment vessel. Second, once the water level subsided, parts of the fuel rods were exposed to air, causing the heat to build up more quickly, leading to core damage from the heat.

 

What are they doing about it?

 

From the very beginning, TEPCO has had the option to flood the reactor chambers with sea water, which would end the problems immediately. Unfortunately, this also destroys the reactors permanently. Doing so would not only cost TEPCO (and Japanese taxpayers) billions of dollars, but it would make that reactor unavailable for generating electricity during a nationwide disaster. The sea water method is a "last resort" in this sense, but it has always been an option.

 

To avoid this, TEPCO first took steps to bring the cooling systems back online and to reduce the pressure on the inside of the containment vessel. This involved bringing in external portable generators, repairing damaged systems, and venting steam and gases from inside the containment vessel. These methods worked for reactor #2 at site one, prior to complications; reactors four through six were shut down before for inspection before the earthquake hit.

 

In the end, TEPCO decided to avoid further risk and flooded reactor #1 with sea water. It is now considered safely under control. Reactor #3 is currently undergoing this process, and reactor #2 may undergo it if a venting procedure fails.

 

The four reactors at site two did not have their external power damaged by the tsunami, and are therefore operating normally, albeit in a post-scram shutdown state. They have not required any venting, and reactor #3 is already in full cold shutdown.

 

Is a "China Syndrome" meltdown possible?

 

No, any fuel melt situation at Fukushima will be limited, because the fuel is physically incapable of having a runaway fission reaction. This is due to their light water reactor design.

 

In a light water reactor, water is used as both a coolant for the fuel core and as a "neutron moderator". What a neutron moderator does is very technical (you can watch a lecture which includes this information here), but in short, when the neutron moderator is removed, the fission reaction will stop.

 

An LWR design limits the damage caused by a meltdown, because if all of the coolant is boiled away, the fission reaction will not keep going, because the coolant is also the moderator. The core will then only generate decay heat, which while dangerous and strong enough to melt the core, is not nearly as dangerous as an active fission reaction.

 

The containment vessel at Fukushima should be strong enough to resist breaching even during a decay heat meltdown. The amount of energy that could be produced by decay heat is easily calculated, and it is possible to design a container that will resist it. If it is not, and the core melts its way through the bottom of the vessel, it will end up in a large concrete barrier below the reactor. It is nearly impossible that a fuel melt caused by decay heat would penetrate this barrier. A containment vessel failure like this would result in a massive cleanup job but no leakage of nuclear material into the outside environment.

 

This is all moot, however, as flooding the reactor with sea water will prevent a fuel melt from progressing. TEPCO has already done this to reactor #1, and is in the process of doing it to #3. If any of the other reactors begin misbehaving, the sea water option will be available for those as well.

 

What was this about an explosion?

 

One of the byproducts of reactors like the ones at Fukushima is hydrogen. Normally this gas is vented and burned slowly. Due to the nature of the accident, the vented hydrogen gas was not properly burned as it was released. This led to a build up of hydrogen gas inside the reactor #1 building, but outside the containment vessel.

 

This gas ignited, causing the top of the largely cosmetic external shell to be blown off. This shell was made of sheet metal on a steel frame and did not require a great deal of force to be destroyed. The reactor itself was not damaged in this explosion, and there were only four minor injuries. This was a conventional chemical reaction and not a nuclear explosion.

 

You see what happened in the photo of the reactor housing. Note that other than losing the sheet metal covering on the top, the reactor building is intact. No containment breach has occurred.

 

At about 2:30AM GMT on March 14th, a similar explosion occurred at the reactor #3 building. This explosion was not unexpected, as TEPCO had warned that one might occur. The damage is still being assessed but it has been announced that the containment vessel was not breached and that the sea water process is continuing.

 

Around 7:30AM GMT on March 14th, it was announced that the explosion at reactor #2 has damaged the already limping cooling systems of reactor #2. It may also receive the sea water treatment if they are unable to use a venting procedure to restart the cooling systems.

 

Is there radiation leakage?

 

The radiation levels outside the plant are higher than usual due to the release of radioactive steam. These levels will go down and return to their normal levels, as no fuel has escaped containment.

 

For perspective, note that charts detailing detrimental radiation exposure start at 1 Gy, equivalent to 1 Sv; the radiation outside the problematic Fukushima reactors is being measured in micro-Svs per hour. The highest reported levels outside the Fukushima reactors has been around 1000 to 1500 micro-Svs per hour. This means that one would have to stay in this area for four to six weeks, 24 hours a day, without protection in order to experience the lowest level of radiation poisoning, which while unpleasant is not normally fatal. And this level will not stay where it is.

 

Also note the chart of normal radiation exposure levels from things like medical x-rays and airline flights.

 

There have also been very minor releases of radioactive reactor byproducts like iodine and cesium along with the steam. This material is less radioactive than the typical output of coal power plants. It is significant mainly as an indicator of the state of the reactor core.

 

I read that there's a plume of radioactive material heading across the Pacific.

 

In its current state, the steam blowing east from Japan across the pacific is less dangerous than living in Denver for a year. If it makes it across the ocean, it will be almost undetectable by the time it arrives, and completely harmless as the dangerous elements in the steam will have decayed by then.

 

What's this about fuel rods being exposed to the air?

 

When the coolant levels inside the reactor get low enough, the tops of the fuel rods will be exposed to the air inside the containment vessel. They have not been exposed to the external atmosphere and the containment vessels are all intact.

 

Can this end up like Chernobyl?

 

No, it cannot. for several reasons.

 

* Chernobyl used graphite as a neutron moderator and water as a coolant. For complicated reasons, this meant that as the coolant heated up and converted to steam, the fission reaction intensified, converting even more water to steam, leading to a feedback effect. The Fukushima reactors use water as both the coolant and the neutron moderator, which means that as the water heats up and converts to steam, the reaction slows down instead. (The effect of the conversion of water coolant to steam on the performance of a nuclear reactor is known as the "void coefficient", and can be either positive or negative.)

* Chernobyl was designed so that as the nuclear fuel heated up, the fission reaction intensified, heating the core even further, causing another feedback effect. In the Fukushima reactors, the fission reaction slows down as the fuel heats up. (The effect of heating of the nuclear fuel on the performance of a nuclear reactor is known as the "temperature coefficient", and can also be positive or negative.)

* Chernobyl's graphite moderator was flammable, and when the reactor exploded, the radioactive graphite burned and ended up in the atmosphere. The Fukushima reactors use water as a neutron moderator, which is obviously not flammable.

 

Note that while Chernobyl used light water as a coolant (as distinct from heavy water), it was not a "light water reactor". The term LWR refers strictly to reactors that use light water for both cooling and neutron moderation.

 

The news said this was the worst nuclear power accident since Chernobyl, though.

 

It's the only nuclear power plant accident of its type since Chernobyl. It's easy to be the worst in a sample size of one.

 

Is this like Three Mile Island?

 

There are similarities. The final effect on the world is likely to be similar: no deaths, minimal external contamination, and a tremendous PR disaster for the nuclear industry due to bad reporting by the media.

 

How can I keep up with developments?

 

The western media has been very bad about reporting this event, due to a combination of sensationalist reporting, ignorance, and the use of inexact or unexplained terminology.

 

One of the safe sources of information is the TEPCO site, which has been posting press releases on a regular basis. Unfortunately, this site is often unresponsive due to the immense traffic it is receiving.

 

The important thing to remember is that most of the "experts" appearing on the news are engaging in speculation. Very few of them are restricting themselves to what they can be sure about, and those that are have often been misrepresented.

 

Reading:

 

* Timeline and data sheets for the incident by the Nuclear Energy Institute : (nei.org)

* The International Atomic Energy Agency is providing regular announcements

* Wikipedia on light water reactors and nuclear weapon design

* The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) Systems manual - the Fukushima reactors are BWRs, a subset of LWRs (nrc.gov)

* Tokyo Electric Power Company site with press releases - currently hard to reach due to traffic (tepco.co.jp/en)

 

Video:

 

* "Physics for Future Presidents" lecture ten, on nuclear weapons and nuclear reactors (Youtube search)

* Footage of the hydrogen explosion at reactor #1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...