sprockets Vintage character and mo-cap animation by Joe Williamsen Character animation exercise by Steve Shelton an Animated Puppet Parody by Mark R. Largent Sprite Explosion Effect with PRJ included from johnL3D New Radiosity render of 2004 animation with PRJ. Will Sutton's TAR knocks some heads! Learn to create your own tool bars! Behind The Scenes: A:M and Animatronics
sprockets
Recent Posts | Unread Content
Jump to content
Hash, Inc. - Animation:Master

*** Paul's Playground ***


Paul Forwood

Recommended Posts

I vaguely recall, that this has something to do with a percentage setting somewhere at the shadows casting of the lights.

Thanks, Jake! I'll try messing with the shadow values. I have been concentrating on the light and model properties up to now and have found that I can eliminate the anomalies by keeping the width softness at either 0% or 100%. Anywhere inbetween causes a problem. I have eliminated just about every other possibilty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 589
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

post-183-1234108856_thumb.jpg

Here is a 360 degree flight around the lights with the colours set to RGB to see how well they interact. I thought that the dark specks might be caused by the angle of the light in relation to the camera but thankfully this shows that it is not the case.

 

The red light, which has a width softness of 50%, is displaying some of those pesky particles but not enough to form streaks. The other two lights have their width softness set to 0% and 100% and don't show any signs of dark particles. Hooray!

Cam360_A00b.mov

 

All of these lights have simple gobos on them to help create the soft streaking of light rays.

One more test render cooking at the moment, which I will post here, and then I will clear out some of the heavy deadwood that I have left all over this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what I have done but suddenly what was taking about 20 minutes to render is now taking several hours. Maybe when I updated the drivers for my graphics card it forced some changes to the rendering or maybe hair is a little denser. Anyway I blocked this out in an Action, tried to render it in a choreography and gave up after 45 minutes when the render was still working on frame 0, pass two, of a three pass render. So this is just rendered in an Action. I'll have to play around with hair some more to get render times down to something useful. Imagine if the rest of his body was in the scene with props and other actors! :blink:

MyClint_Head_Talk_A001d.mov

-------------------------

Edit:

Okay! :)

I reduced hair density from 60% to 45 %, adjusted the Muh Hair strength properties, (which had unexplainedly changed to very high values :blink: ), and switched shaders on in the render properties. Now my render times have gone back to their previous state... in the choreography... with ray traced shadows! That is great! :)

But what changed the Muh Hair properties and why did I get such high render times even though I had shaders turned off in the render properties? One to watch I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have made the head rig compatible with A:M Track/ZignTrack so all I need to do is drop one of my old ZT Action files onto him, adjust the pivot points of a few bones and he should be talking rubbish.

That I'd like to see!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That I'd like to see!

I have to put in a few bones that I didn't get around to doing and alter a couple more on the mouth before I finish weighting it for ZignTrack. That may not happen for a week or two but I will post something when I get around to it.

 

the hair is nice and the facial expresions ,you got it

Thanks, Steve. Not quite Clint yet though.

 

In the meantime here is something else that I started:

 

post-183-1235420745_thumb.jpg

OctoTest_A00.mov

-------------------------------------------------

Just testing the rig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the Oktapodi movie only has 6 is there a reason for this do you think

Well it certainly cuts down on the amount of work that the animators would have to do but it also makes for a cleaner, easier to read, character. This guy won't be taking a lead roll and won't have to do half the things that the octopii in "Oktapodi" had to do. I have to give him a bit more character now and get away from that uniform shape.

 

Nice Octopus, Paul.

Thanks, Nancy.

 

This is a test model that I did back in September:

post-183-1235428832_thumb.jpg

The rig didn't work quite as well as the new one. Not enough bones in the tentacles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats good ,the rigging of the tenticles must be a bit of a knightmare but theye work well .I notice you have the full 8 legs but the Oktapodi movie only has 6 is there a reason for this do you think

 

Don't forget what Pixar did with the ant legs in "Bugs Life". Those other guys went more realistic with "Ants" which I felt made the characters look more "alien" and less "friendly"... although imagining Stalone and Woody Allen with 6 legs was not much of a stretch. ;)

 

-vern

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I enjoyed both Ants and A Bug's Life. Ants had a darker feel but had some outstanding imagery and social comment while A Bug's Life kept things light and catered primarily to the kids.

very cool stuff!

Thanks!

 

I've made a few changes to the octopus:

post-183-1235560827_thumb.jpg

Blue_A01.mov

He still needs loosening up and he also needs his 'suck and blow' apparatus.

All of these textures are still temporary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the encouragement, people! :)

I have been a little distracted by my octopus models, trying out different approaches to a mouth and textures. So far I prefer the simplicity of old Blue, (no mouth), but I had to try some more talkative versions as well.

 

Gazzamataz!:D Yeah, I'm still playing around in here.

It has been a while but I can see that you have been busy with your AM studies. I checked out your new showreel and was just amazed at the leap forward in the quality of your work! You have some very convincing animation examples in there now. Looking very strong. Well done!

 

Here is a species that you might find anywhere between the Carribean and Ethiopia:

post-183-1235906764_thumb.jpg

Rasta_B_A04c.mov

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now That is nice modelling the mouth and eyes are teriffic,I gota say I do like the pullover he has on in the image though,keeps him warm .Very nice work Paul

edit

He would make a hell of a rugby player or a goalie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL Has that rasta Octopus been done somewhere before? It seems a perfect match. Very nice work so far Paul. Looking forward to seeing what you do with all these models. I hope you're YouTubing this stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Steve. :)

Has that rasta Octopus been done somewhere before? It seems a perfect match.

That's what I thought too. :)

post-183-1236275275_thumb.jpg

Why_A00eComp.mov

I tried bringing this guy into A:M 15 and had some problems with an action that I had made in A:M14. For some strange reason CPs in the face had become offset across the y-axis and nothing I could do would correct the problem. I checked their assignments and all was correct, including the weighting, but I couldn't get them to jump back into their correct postions. There was a "Splines" folder in the Action but A:M15 wouldn't let me delete it. Eventually I gave in and deleted the action alltogether.

 

I then set my displacement map back to 'displacement' instead of 'bump', something that appears to be neccessary in A:M15 in order to be able to work with the realtime display, and A:M instantly became unuseable so I rebooted, set the displacement map again and it "took" so I tried a render. Everything that has the displacement map refused to render at all so I compromised again and ditched the displacement. (Sigh)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
LOL Has that rasta Octopus been done somewhere before?

 

The closest to this I've seen are the two jelly fish stooges 'Ernie and Bernie' from 'Shark Tales'. They stole the scene in every scene they were in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats looking really good Paul. WHY?

Persistence?

Or maybe you just like your cephelapods with smooooth legs. ;)

Seriously though, he needs his suckers so for the moment he'll have to jump back into A:M 14. I've got to finish rigging his mouth and then give his eyes some attention. Some weighting issues to sort out too. Then he might start to look the part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-183-1236732833_thumb.jpg

(This movie has been updated in my next post.)

 

I finally had a chance to try one of my old Zign Track Actions on Clint. There was bit more tweaking than I anticipated because it has been a while since I last used any mocap data, and this character's face rig is little different from previous versions, but after I made a few minor adjustments and rebooted A:M it was fine.

 

I have shown this action before, on a completely different model, and it was obvious then that I hadn't filtered the jitters enough. I have added a couple of "B" phonemes, where the mouth shapes were not strong enough, and I have animated the eyes, blinks, head and neck motion by hand.

 

All very rough but very quick! :)

 

I need to find, or record, some suitable dialogue next.

ClintZT_A00.mov

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I enjoyed both Ants and A Bug's Life. Ants had a darker feel but had some outstanding imagery and social comment while A Bug's Life kept things light and catered primarily to the kids.

very cool stuff!

Thanks!

 

I've made a few changes to the octopus:

post-183-1235560827_thumb.jpg

Blue_A01.mov

He still needs loosening up and he also needs his 'suck and blow' apparatus.

All of these textures are still temporary.

 

WOW!!!!

 

GEAT WORK!!!

 

It has Both a Cartoony and Realistic look at the same time.

 

Very Impressive!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Steve. :)

Has that rasta Octopus been done somewhere before? It seems a perfect match.

That's what I thought too. :)

post-183-1236275275_thumb.jpg

Why_A00eComp.mov

I tried bringing this guy into A:M 15 and had some problems with an action that I had made in A:M14. For some strange reason CPs in the face had become offset across the y-axis and nothing I could do would correct the problem. I checked their assignments and all was correct, including the weighting, but I couldn't get them to jump back into their correct postions. There was a "Splines" folder in the Action but A:M15 wouldn't let me delete it. Eventually I gave in and deleted the action alltogether.

 

I then set my displacement map back to 'displacement' instead of 'bump', something that appears to be neccessary in A:M15 in order to be able to work with the realtime display, and A:M instantly became unuseable so I rebooted, set the displacement map again and it "took" so I tried a render. Everything that has the displacement map refused to render at all so I compromised again and ditched the displacement. (Sigh)

 

HAHAHAHA!!!!

 

LMAO!!!!!

 

GREAT!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-183-1236732833_thumb.jpg

ClintZT_A00.mov

 

I finally had a chance to try one of my old Zign Track Actions on Clint. There was bit more tweaking than I anticipated because it has been a while since I last used any mocap data, and this character's face rig is little different from previous versions, but after I made a few minor adjustments and rebooted A:M it was fine.

 

I have shown this action before, on a completely different model, and it was obvious then that I hadn't filtered the jitters enough. I have added a couple of "B" phonemes, where the mouth shapes were not strong enough, and I have animated the eyes, blinks, head and neck motion by hand.

 

All very rough but very quick! :)

 

I need to find, or record, some suitable dialogue next.

 

You are Just Too Much!

 

Keep On Keeping On!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, thanks for the comments, Steve and Nuba X!

Steve, jitter means 'to shake' and is the effect you see in this animation because I didn't filter it out when I saved the Action file from Zine Track. I could go back and do it now but I think that I'll just be more careful next time.

-------------------------------------------------

Back to Clint:

 

post-183-1236813196_thumb.jpg

ClintZT_A00c.mov

This is a slight update on the last movie. I smoothed out x rotation data for the errant lip bone with one fell stroke. Just grabbed the whole channel and scaled it down. I didn't know that was possible before. Great! :) I have also added a few more phonemes for "B, W and Oo" shapes. Although this has a fairly nice feel to it really doesn't do justice to what is possible with AM Track/Zign Track if you take a little more care with the initial filming of the actor's face and set your filters to remove the shaking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Do you look that good singin' the tune?

Well, I've got a little more hair and almost as many teeth. ;D

 

Sorry it took a while to reply to your post, Myron, but I've been busy stoking up a new collaboration. It is going to take a long while to do it but I'm going to have fun. Hey, with the sound ready to work to, half the job is already done! :D

 

People can follow the progress here:

Fishin'

 

The blog will be tidied up over the next couple of days. Until then you can make as much mess as you like.

-----------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you look that good singin' the tune?

Well, I've got a little more hair and almost as many teeth. ;D

 

Sorry it took a while to reply to your post, Myron, but I've been busy stoking up a new collaboration. It is going to take a long while to do it but I'm going to have fun. Hey, with the sound ready to work to, half the job is already done! :D

 

People can follow the progress here:

Fishin'

 

The blog will be tidied up over the next couple of days. Until then you can make as much mess as you like.

-----------------------------

I love your style!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just an early test for the forest. Hair is the only real solution for such a lot of trees but that brings problems with it. The scene is set at sunset but the hair trees can't reflect the sunlight convincingly so I will just have to paint it into the textures.

Intro_Decent_B00eComp.mov

 

A:M hair has real issues when using hair images combined with fog. This is a shame as I really want the aerial perspective that fogging gives so I will have to paint it in and just restrict the camera to side panning and short dollys. No rotations without cuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a mighty impressive set - always amazes me how people do landscape sets

 

Are you using a combo of hair trees and cookie cutter trees? And maybe painted tree backgrounds?

 

And when you say hair tree - do you mean the hair emitter is a tree image? or the tree(s) have hair leaf emitters?

 

really nice job !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...