robcat2075

I believe the original star trek warp drive effect was created by moving the motion controlled model in front of the camera while the shutter was open . the computer motion control moved the model precisely over varying distances during each frame to create the streak effect . If you are willing to animate on the sub frame level , you can get similar effects with multipass in animation master . the ball in this animation is moved varying distances forward and back within each frame. [attachmentid=22754] the project with sub-frame animation [attachmentid=22755] however, multi pass averages all the sub frames together resulting in a somewhat darker blur than one would get on film. it's possible that animation master's high dynamic range rendering might enable a more authentic effect with multi pass , but I'm not familiar with HD rendering yet . warpblur3H.mov warpblur.zip

ok, that would be a scary ride.

you really mean holding shift while you click on a spline while in add mode , right ? just pressing shift-a couldn't possibly know where to put the new CP.

Ok, that part was out of date. Add-lock behavior is the normal default mode of the Add tool now. The old simple Add just drew 2 CPs and stopped... I think.

Guess which intersection is BAD... [attachmentid=22667] bad spline continuity causes creases and weird shading artifacts . Splines like to cross like an X. they don't like to bounce off each other like two parentheses )( the basic splinesmanship pages are still solid advice. can you point to an example that didn't seem right ?

That Skylark tut is a classic. Anyway, I believe "spline direction" refers to how splines "meet". More often called "spline continuity" . [attachmentid=22665] Crossing GOOD... bouncing off each other BAD. They can appear the same, especially if they are peaked at the meeting point. But the bad way is really bad.

Look's like you've got a good start. A 5-10 second clip ought to fit here easily. try these compression settings. [attachmentid=22619] increase the KB/sec setting if the image is too blurry

Maybe your lens is not "focused". Maybe the objects you are looking at aren't the right distance. Maybe your index of refraction is too high. You need three things: -your surface must have reflectivity -Your render settings must have Reflections "ON" -your scene must have something for the object to reflect.

What you're saying is that everytime you made a change you saved over the same file? Or hadn't even been saving at all? There's a lesson here Each of the asterisks above would definitely be a time to save a version of your model. model_001 model_002 model_003 Then, you'd be able to go back to the version just before the trouble started instead of having to go back to the very beginning. I'm guessing you altered the heirarchy of the bones accidentally. Or maybe have some CPs mis-assigned. But not knowing how you did it makes it tough to diagnose.

The "Show Some Backbone" tutorial shows how to scale the premade rig to fit a character. For most characters it will work well and you don't need know about most constraints. Follw the tut and scale it to match your character instead of Thom. But it doesn't cover constraints. If you want to know more about how the constraints work, here's a walk thru on the simplest possible IK leg Simplest_IK_Leg_H.mov Once you digest that there's a written tut on a more functional IK leg setup David Rogers' Tut

tried Help>Reset Settings?

That works quite well. Great looking character and he looks well rigged too! He looks like he's hiding from Officer McKnuckles. If I were going to alter one thing about his jump it would be to make his stretched out pose happen on his last frame of contact with the ground intead of 2-3 frames later in the air. that would make his jump look most forceful.

Awww... cute ant!

Are the bones in your flower actually named "right____" and "left ____"? Mirroring bones requires that and that the spine bones be absolutely centered. A flower doesn't really have a right and left to mirror.

Can you make a screen cam movie of you doing it?

no, you shouldn't. Didn't we do this one already? Mirror mode is only for modeling, BTW.

A fine experiment. So where's the chain(s)? I have a tandem; it's common, but not mandatory, that the cranks are offset 90°

Can you say more about what you don't understand about the channels/bias settings?

Basically, if you want a foot to stay put from 00:00 to 02:00 you need keys on 00:00 and 02:00 and they need to be "zero-slope" keys. More keys in the middle won't change much about the foot, but if you get some because you've been force-keying the whole model it won't hurt anything. Probably not. But the same principles apply. if you want the door to stay put from 00:00 to 05:00 you need keys on 00:00 and 05:00 and they need to be "zero-slope" keys. That's why those came first. Those pretty much make you move the whole body for every key so the advanced concept of keying something to make it stay still isnt' needed yet. Gotta introduce them sometime. That's what this project does. ok, I think we've found the problem...

Wonderful work! I really like the graphic camoflage design which I presume is authentic Razzle-Dazzle style.

Somebody get that alien a cheeseburger.

Hey Dagoos, you oughta submit that to Spike and Mike's Festival of Sick and Twisted Animation. I think it could make it in. I suppose if I said I like Santa Claus you'd tell me that was all a trick too.

That looks wonderful! Love the ears!

http://www.hash.com/forums/index.php?s=&am...st&p=197119

That was cute, I don't think I had caught that in either version before. I notice the audio track uses more MBs than the video. If you have QT pro, the AAC codec could probably cut that down.