Jump to content
Hash, Inc. Forums

Dhar

A:M Users 2019
  • Content Count

    3,851
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Dhar

  • Rank
    Animation Fundamentalist

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.dharlinganimation.com/
  • ICQ
    0

Previous Fields

  • Interests
    3D animation - Sci Fi movies - cartooning - good music.
  • A:M version
    wha?
  • Hardware Platform
    Mac/Win
  • System Description
    OSX, XP Pro
  • Self Assessment: Animation Skill
    Advanced
  • Self Assessment: Modeling Skill
    Knowledgeable
  • Self Assessment: Rigging Skill
    Familiar

Profile Information

  • Name
    Dhar
  • Location
    San Francisco, Ca.
  1. HAPPY BIRTHDAY DHAR! :)

  2. No need to apologize, I was just wondering what's next. Sounds great! A TSM Squetch rig is a win/win situation. I can hardly wait. Take your time, obsess about it, its gonna be awesome.
  3. I guess the only thing left is a video tutorial? Maybe? Any time soon?
  4. That's right huh? never mind then. What do you mean? I was referring to Vern's "malicious entity".
  5. I think Vern is on the right track. You can never be too careful. I like the idea of the file having a permenant DL point here in the forum or somewhere on A:M's main page. Maybe it can be included as part of next year's A:M version???
  6. Maybe its a good idea to attach the release letter with the file.
  7. I bought their rig after they discontinued it - but I'm happy to have contributed to them. I also purchased their training videos. They're a great bunch. I will purchase more of their awesome products down the line. Thanks Anzovin. EDIT: Robcat: what do you have up your sleeve?
  8. here is one I made long ago. I hope its good enough for you Bed.zip
  9. Like Mark said; the rig will fit any model. If you follow Zundel's modeling techniques, he likes the thumb at 45 degrees down. I think next time I'll keep the whole hand flat so I don't have to manipulate the rig too much.
  10. Dhar

    Bouncing Ball issues

    Make sure you are in Action or Chor.
  11. Your points are valid. But weighting each CP and then changing the weight in trial & error just seems like a lot of work. Inbetweening was a lot of work in the old days of cell animation, which is something the computer can do now. I'm asking if there is a way where the computer can do the weighting than having to do it manually. There obviously is, but to minimize the cleanup, I think a model with splines stitched a certain way can make the job easier. That's what I'm looking for.
  12. What about the weighting?
  13. I think Robert expressed it better what I was talking about. A set of parameters of specifically named group of CPs or splines that the Squetchrig would recognize and assign the CPs to the corresponding bones AFTER the rig has been sized to your model. So, it doesn't have to be Sam or any specific model. What I'm after, I guess, is some form of standardization of modeling - CPs, groups, splines- that will aid in the ease of the rig installation. You see, what we have in the Squetch rig is a standard of bones and actions that are designed to give top notch animation. But if the model (such as Gumbo) was not modeled with the Squetchrig in mind then I have either limited some of the features of the rig, and/or overwhelmed myself with, as lergento mentioned, a sizable project. The model and the rig need to meet somewhere in the middle. Now that we have the rig, I feel there need to be specific way of modeling that will utilize the most out of the rig. Did I confuse the issue further???
  14. OK, the next time I model a character I'll give it to you CP weight it For me, I want to animate, NOW. Which is why I have little patience for modeling and rigging.
  15. Yeah, it does help, however, I was hoping for a more complete install rather than "close" and then having to tweak the tight areas. What I was aiming for is some standard method of modeling that would facilitate the squetchrig in such a way that no further CP weighting would be necessary. Refer to my pic, you'll see how some splines on my model correspond with Sam's (red line). But, because I was following Barry Zubdell's method of modeling, many splines do not correspond anymore, which forced me to individually (painstakingly) assign and weight the CPs to achieve smooth transitions. My thinking is to somehow find a standard number of splines (or way of modeling) that will give the best performance. You told me when I was modeling Gumbo that no less than 8 splines should exist for the eyelids to perform satisfactorily. Now if there was a way that an Auto_assign would exactly assign and weight those 8 splines, that would eliminate the need of tweaking. You see, now that I have some experience with the Squetchrig I am mor inclined to re-model Gumbo in a fashion that will easily accept the Squetchrig without any after-tweaking. Is that possible?
×
×
  • Create New...