robcat2075

Ideas... - on "Largent, Mark, R." is there a way to make the L and M justify better? Perhaps a custom designed M with a vertical side. - will the three descriptive lines beside your name be active links that go somewhere? Or perhaps mousing over them would highlight relevant portions of your cityscape? If mousing over "3D animation" highlighted the theater somehow, that would help quickly convey the idea that The Paunk Show is examples of your 3D animation. - The guy at the bottom looks like his pants are falling down.

The first take is just cloth, the second is with a procedural noise material on top of it for additional ambient water activity. cloth16_000.mov Update: here's some extra shark action... SHARK! SHARK! cloth18W_000.mov

of the four, the third one had 0.5cm patches, the rest had 1cm patches. The denser mesh took many times longer to simulate. I found that the general movement of the waves wasn't radically different/better for the denser mesh, the cloth settings make the most change, so I'm less inclined to pursue very dense setups.

That movie has ony one frame?

Here is a composite of four other tests with different settings. None of these are highly successful but they will inform future experimenting.. clothripplesTests.mov

Here's a different test. This uses cloth as a water surface for rippling. Notice that that waves even bounce off the edges of the container which is cool. ripplesA.mov

Probably good for today's attention spans, too.

I like the Hall of Fame!

Tired of animating? Or anything else? Scientists agree: Coffee naps are better than coffee or naps alone

I'm reminded of Rodney's avatar. It worked better on the old forum but he made it look like his fingers were reaching outside the frame.

I think the colon is an essential element that helps distinguish "A:M" from any other "AM" no matter what font it's typed in.

Yuk...

That Shapeways preview looks like it has worse faceting than the Sculpteo result.

Cool! My first guess is that reflection levels need to be higher.

No single-click solution but here is the thread where we discussed various other solutions http://www.hash.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46405&hl=spline+ring

For this to be very useful I think it will need preserve the old decal on the new patches. .

If it was something you needed to do a lot you wouldn't want to have to keep doing >Wizards>plugin every time.

It's faster than mine, either way!

I will be curious to hear how that goes.

Welcome back, Walter!

There should be a way to save what was on the four old patches and slap that onto the four new patches since the general arrangement of them is the same and and the outer boundaries are the same.

There must be some judgement at work in the current OBJ importer because it does make the correct connection at each junction most of the time. I wonder what's different about the times it makes the wrong connection.

I haven't had as much trouble with v18 but it does need some more work to get back to the v17 level.

Were you using MacOS or Windows?

I don't know if the MS Surface qualifies as a form-factor success yet, but Apple is making an iPad in that size next... The Giant iPad That Apple Is Working On Could Be A Dream Device I think it's getting too big for something that only does what an iPad does?