robcat2075

Put the "Modeled, animated and rendered with Martin Hash's Animation:Master" in fine print on the copyright slide. Pixar and Dreamworks give their software a plug in their movies. You can too!

For the material change maybe a material effector would be the easiest manuver.

That looks super, Mark! My one crit upon watching it would be that in some of the dialog you're occasionally cutting too late to the next shot, leaving an awkward pause in there. I just noticed that on a few cuts. But that's a great looking show! (needs an A:M mention in the credits) Perhaps try uploading a Quicktime mov with AAC audio rather than converting to Flash.

I'm guessing either Paul Forewood or Mark Skodacek would be the answer people on this...

I don't think there's a set date yet. I think the public beta arrives when Steffen feels he's done with adding new features and it's just the general torture testing left to do. Short answer... I don't know.

Congrats on the gig!

I wonder if there is a hierarchy that is most transportable and doesn't cause A:M to have look for assets if you transfer it to another drive?

I like the wavy planks, but some of your treasure is going to fall out! Maybe nudge them closer together. I like the larger size planks on the bottom. I think scaling them smaller would get too busy.

Question for someone who really knows the set.... What do we have to key to capture the state of every light and whatever else is affecting the appearance of the set? Is it ALL run by pose sliders?

I am baffled by the idea that the set and fixed camera location are limiting. I've got more ideas for things to do on this set that will be perfectly visible from a fixed camera location than I'll ever have time animate. What is it that someone is proposing to do that requires flying that camera around the set? The BUS STOP scenario was extremely limited, you couldn't even zoom or pan the camera and people still came up with lots of good ideas.

I dont' see a pic.

Also... in the PWS you can drag one model onto another to add it to the second model.

solution for now... These long frames are blank frames? And for some reason you need these frames in the footage? Render the whole thing to targas in shaded mode first. Then just render the frames where the object appears in Final mode. You can set a custom range of frames in render options. In your editor make the footage invisible where ever the shaded frames still show.

Penthouse = that glass thing? If visibility into that is an issue we could just take out every other vertical slat and that would improve the optics as well as swinging the camera across from it.

Here's a test PRJ I just made in v13 VaseTest.prj A vase travels from off screen to on screen to off screen. It took 5 seconds to render 30 frames to TGAs with alpha. That's my long way of saying i can't reproduce that problem based on what i know so far. There must be something more specific about your PRJ.

On SVN... I'm thinking we should not use it at all. It's bit too complicated for an "anyone can play" project like this and even though it could be explained you'd likely spend a lot of time doing it and it might be the initial barrier that stops some people from trying at all. Posting the ZIP on the forum makes it very accessible and email and DropBox are good enough for returning work.

Definitely keep us posted on your progress and the solutions you find along the way.

I think the nose looks rather more pinched than the reference photo?

Are there any nominees for a better prime camera spot than the one in the set now? My feeling about some of the windows not being ideal is... use a window that is! Windows could be reused, no?

Can you make a screen cam of this happening? Resize A:m so it's not covering the entire screen and then capture Just A:M.

That is indeed my expectation of how it would work except for the camera physically flying over to the windows. Ideally every shot could edit right to the next one, but that's unlikely so the character can be brought back to establish some major change.

When i make the changes to the "Shortcut to Material" that appears under the Bones folder, the keyframes get made in a accompanying "Shortcut to material" that is in the Choreography Action and those survive a save. But I'm having trouble finding a parameter to change that makes an obvious visual difference so I'm not sure if this is working right or not. I'm wondering what causes those "Shortcut to Materials" that have a question mark behind the gear icon. Those have been a problem before.

I'm not trying to irritate anyone with my explanation of gravity and squetch on bouncing balls, but if I'm giving comments on gravity and squetch I'll likely do it in the framework that made it all make sense for me and gave me the most information to carry forward to other animation that is not bouncing balls. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

I'd rather have the camera in one spot. Is there a better spot to put it so the most windows are most visible? I figure that no matter where you put it some thing will be not ideal. But maybe there's a better spot?

Can you tell me exactly what to try to set in the Chor ? I could try it in v17