KenH

You should be getting a shadow of the bulb on the ground there. Also, there's not much volumetrics going on there so try playing with the brightness and contrast values.

Oh yeah, it's in the competition. You should see it sometime after the 4th March. Also, I didn't elliminate it completely. It seemed to have problems in an enclosed space. Anyway....back on topic....

I think there's less light on this side of the house. I brightened the latest in PS and liked it better as you can see the roughness of the walls better. But I like abit of darkness in there.

He looks great! You've a style of your own and I think you've improved on your last character. I'd say the shoes look abit too egg shaped and perfect. Also I agree with the comments above. I love the volumetric spotlight he's in! God I love volumetrics!!!Every light should have one! He seems like a magician on stage.

Don't forget the softness within the shadow options of the light.

Nope..is it a vacum cleaner?

It's probably too late, but I'd like to see a little hint of "God Lines".

I'd say you need to increase the softness of your volumetric lights. Also, try using multipass rendering.

Fronter on CGT.com?

Yes! Fog! It's built into the renderer, but I've never tried it. Looking good. I think you need at least 25 passes for good DoF.

Nice! I look forward to seeing what you can do with AM today!

Eh!?! Is that supposed to happen while looking at those!? Her eyes seem a little starey in the first one but everything else is fine....just fine.

I think it would be good to have a really famous painting (eg Mona Lisa) but it's turned upside down because people in this art gallery like it better that way.

Yeah Squiggles have rights too! Let her live! Let her live! At least show a doctor coming in and resusitating her! Nice "artsey" animation.

Whaaa! Me wanna see!

I've just compiled an animation with sound in AM and it doesn't have any chirps. But I did have to trim a few of the sounds as they had extra waves in them that other players ignored. Maybe that's the problem? Sorensen is built into AM. Just go to quicktime in the render settings and look in it's settings. In there you'll see at the top a drop down menu and the codec is there. As others have said, it's an excellent codec.

The distance between the top of the eyes and the bottom of the bone seems too much. But again, it might be what you're aiming for.

I agree. The width of the head seems right, so it might just be a matter of detailing the bone. Also, I'm sure I saw one or two splines around the eye that weren't necessary at both ends....hooks could be used.

Nice start. Wires would be good to see.

That image should be stamped in the manual.

Nice! I particularly like the fly robot.

No they'll get narrower. They look right to me. Nice work!

Looks great! Keep us updated on your progress....

Beautiful design. You've got a style all of your own. I'm dying to see why the robot only has one arm!

Man, he's just a WOOKIE. You're expecting far too much. He's probably never even heard of the moon.....maybe EndorWalk.