Fuchur

I tend to say that the Windows-version is slightly more stable than the Mac-versions... I don't own a Mac, so I cant proove it... this is just from what I have read. In Vista you will have to deactivate Desktop-Composition (you can set that for each programm individuelly) and after that it should run well. Hash won't be on the Siggraph. Martin thinks (I tend to say he is right) that Siggraph is dieing. But you will find Hash on the Comicon 2009 in San Diego, (quite large) and some others... Someone from hash should answer you there... Maybe there is a roadmap somewhere... *Fuchur*

Very cool model! And not that bad walkcycle for a quick and dirty one... *Fuchur*

Wrong video-codec? Try something like "Animation" from Quicktime... this is an old one which should be readable no matter what... *Fuchur*

Have a look at the PRJ-file. It is quite simple. If you dont get it, drag one of the 20 points around... *Fuchur*

Good thought. I bought a copy some time back, but have yet to open it up and play around with it. I'll give it a shot. You will nevertheless have to do the UVs first... Automatic UVs are okay, but not perfect... *Fuchur*

My tutorial is quite basic here. It is not much about flattening and using the UV-editor, etc. but mostly about decaling. Anyway: A:M doesnt have a good UV-editor... it lags many things, because A:M is more about decals itself, not about UV-editing afterwards. (For example: The UV-editor doesnt even offer the possibilitie to select several CPs with the shift-key / alt-key. It can't disconnect whole patches by selecting a whole patch and move it away, etc... however it can disconnect CPs from other CPs by pressing the CTRL-key...) The UV-editor is useable, but could be improved... The better way is to use an action, flatten (I prefer to flatten by hand, not with the flatten-function) the model and apply the texture. That's the way to go. A:M isnt about using a basic mapping and than splitting and realigning the parts in the UV-editor. It is about decals/stamps. Even if you want to use an UV-technique, it will still be decal-based! However for mechanical models this is often not necessary. But it is for organic once! *Fuchur* PS: The tutorials on my site are quite large, but today it shouldnt be a bigger problem for most broadband-users (ADSL, etc.). It just wanted a nice quality and not the usual "300px x 300px"-badquality-mini-tutorial.

It is not possible in an automatic way. You can ask Hash to unlock it for another machine, but this will mean that your homecomputer will not work no longer. This is meant for people who are changing computers permamently... There are two different possibilities for you: 1.) Get more Websubscriptions. 2.) Get one CD/DVD-Version. Here the CD/DVD (dont know eactly if it is still a CD) is the dongle and you can change computers as often as you wish to by putting the DVD in another dvd-drive. *Fuchur*

Depends on what you are after... how "new" is your character? Do you WANT to use existing models or should it be all "yours", etc. I usually model everything from the beginning, not even using my own models as a start. As long as I am not on pressure with deadlines of course. For me it is fun to model... BUT you need to know how to model to do that. So if you didnt quite get the thing with continuity, 5pointers, etc. you shouldnt try that. On the other hand: Trial and Error is often the best teacher. (at least for me) You will learn WHY you shouldnt do something. Not only how to do it right. That is often a very effective way to solve future-problems.... etc.

Okay... lets be sure about this: 1.) Your JPEG_Sequenz / TGA-Sequenz is numbered like this: "image_1.jpg" , "image_2.jpg" OR "image1.jpg", "image2.jpg" OR "image01.jpg", "image02.jpg" -> Important is, that the number at the end is running up. 2.) The images are the same size? (don't know if it acutally makes a difference, but just to be sure) for instance 300px x 300px each... 3.) You imported with the option "imagesequenz" (the checkbox under the explorer-window has to be checked, no matter if you are using "import image" or "import as an animation..." (it's both the same but the checkbox is checked by default...) *Fuchur*

The surface-properties you showed us in the other thread are the once of a whole model and they are usually set to the values you showed us. It is quite unlikely that they are causing problems. It maybe a keyframe thing... *Fuchur*

Hm... Fire like a certain object so... Several options come to my mind: 1.) Use A:Ms sprite-particles with "Die on Impact" enabled. You could now use a model (shaped like the dragon) to be the hitobject. Next use several small fire-particleemitter in the model and it should look a bit like the fire is dragonshaped. 2.) Use the object as emitter and try that. It could work and will be much less trouble. 3.) Create a image-sequenz of a fire and use a compositing-prorgramm to create a mask for it, which is shaped like the dragon... won't look that good, if you are not animating the mask very heavily, but may be good enough. (only recommended for one cameraposition, not a animated camera) I could be wrong, but have a look at the Hash-CD / Datafolder. Isn't there a material for explosions and one for fire? (cant look right now) *Fuchur*

RGB { 0 - 255 } -> Middlegray: 128 / 127 (128 is comon) -> RGB: 128/128/128 For some dents you could use a patch-image (if the patches are more or less the same size) or you could try out BitMapPlus (which only works with Normal-Maps so, not Bumpmaps or displacementmaps (it's a pitty...) Patch-Images can be created by creating a group, clicking in the PWS with the rightmousebutton on it and choosing "New Image". That will tell A:M to use the same image on every patch of the model. If you need more control you however will have to unwrap / flatten your model. *Fuchur*

If you know that you will not work longer on it, I would recommend to consolidate the project and zip it into one file. That way you wont loose anything if you want to get it done a year later. The best way however is to use a good projectstructure and always save a copy of your models into it. Dont know if this can help you but I recently wrote a small batch-file which will create the project-structure for you. Just copy the folder and the batch-file into the same folder (for example C:\3d-Projects\) and create a shortcut to the batch-file on your desktop. Doubleclick on the shortcut, follow the instructions on the screen and it will create a projectfolder for you. See you *Fuchur* projectwizard_v0_1.zip

The easiest way to handle this: First render everything out like you want it (color-wise), than deactivate every light and render again. Now use the second image as an alpha-channel in your 2d-programm and everything should work. *Fuchur*

Mpeg4 can be played by Quicktime and VLC-Player: VLC-Player *Fuchur*

You will need a material effector for something like that. You can than create two materials and assign one of them to the material effector. If you now bring the material-effector near a surface, the cut area will get the new material while the rest will have the old material. *Fuchur*

You although may have a look at Steffens "Resurface"-Plugin. It can help, if the mesh is setted in the right way, too. The second way is a boolean, but it will not actually deform the surfaces but cut them away. *Fuchur*

Not really... most of us doesnt use the bvh-file for anything... give it a day... maybe someone can help you here. *Fuchur*

Ponytails can be created with the "shift-hair" in a very easy way... When you create the hair-emitter press "Shift" while you click on Hair. Now create a spline in a model-window. Assign the material to the spline (go to the "Spline"-Folder and drag it on the spline not on a group!) *Fuchur*

v13 was only delievered with the CD-version... so it cant be the websubscription. You would have to speak to Hash about that... but I highly doubt you would get another CD. They can't be sure that you lost the CD / DVD and so they would have to risk that someone gets two versions for the price of one. AND what is although very likly is, that they will not do it because you dont have the current versionn (version 15 is out for quite a while now). So it is a pitty, but it looks as if you have to buy the websubscription (or a new CD-version) to run A:M again if you dont find your v13 CD. *Fuchur*

What do you want to do? There are different particle-types for different possibilities. Sprites are the most flexibile once. You can define an image which will be used as particle. See you *Fuchur*

I think he doesnt have to, if it is a game like earth of empire, etc. Than the images will be enough. *Fuchur*

At this point it got 4900 patches Till now, eh? Will you model it in one peace or do you split it? *Fuchur*

Looks like you got fun there michel Nice test... *Fuchur*

I am talking about the straight lines. Have a look at the grey-material inside the sphere. They are not supposed to be there. It is hard to see in the low-resolution-image in the red-part in the upper left corner but I cropped the area out. Have a look at this area. *Fuchur*