Jump to content
Hash, Inc. Forums

Fuchur

*A:M User*
  • Content Count

    5,231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    55

Everything posted by Fuchur

  1. Hi, yes, pretty much exactly what Robert said. Internal patches might be bad here and of cause: Everything needs to be closed (it does not have to be connected but it needs to be closed and of cause it needs a thickness everywhere. Normals can be fixed in general, but it is better to already do them right in A:M. A starting point is to use > Remove Internal Patches, but that can not give it a thickness at any place. You will have to fix that by hand. Best regards *Fuchur*
  2. Great looking material – please let us know about how you did it :). Best regarts *Fuchur*
  3. Thank you very much :). Best regards *Fuchur*
  4. Try Filezilla. That should work.
  5. That is fine. Robert will test it through and give it to Steffen is necessary too :).
  6. I can't seem to reproduce that crash. Could you give the steps you are doing to get it to crash? In the video you can see what I tried out. Best regards *Fuchur* plugin_cutplane_test.mp4
  7. In general it depends on what you are trying to build from it. Is it only a round object without any attachments? Than 4 can be fine. 6 is pretty uncommon if you ask me (in general it should be divideable by 4 because that makes it easier to work with on the axis evenly). For really round objects in close up situations go with 8 or higher. If you plan to attach something to it (for instance you want to attach an arm to a torso or something) you will likly be more happy with 8 or 12. It is all about the structure of the splines / patches / CPs. For better understanding you can hav
  8. Please have a look here: https://www.hash.com/renew-subscription-44-en Best regards *Fuchur*
  9. Hi Robert, ah I see... yes that is pretty much fine... 4.7 GHz is more or less max if you are not doing a overclock by hand... sometimes it can go higher than that even, but in general 4.7 to 4.9 is the max. I am not sure what is causing the above 25% but that seems to be normal. Maybe it is about refreshing the windows or switching between cores or something. But it is constantly going below that again after a short while. I think only Steffen could answer that, but it is very likely just some kind of overhead like that. Best regards *Fuchur*
  10. I am using Windows 10 with the default powermanegement. Anyway it would only be one core or thread no matter what and I doubt Windows is going to throttle that CPU because of about 6% usage at most ;). The 5900x is a 12-core / 24-threads CPU. I asked Steffen recently to see if there is a reason why there are only 12 render slaves with netrender available currently if you have a 12-core CPU (I seem to remember it was the thread count not the core count and maybe it would be good to have 1 or 2 threads for net renderer to manage the others) but lets see what he says about that. I re-
  11. I just downloaded v15j+ (32bit) and got these results with it. It is between 03:24-03:30 for the teapot benchmark. Hopefully I got everything right and compareable with the render settings, because that version has not yet the feature to import render preset files. It is a little bit hard to compare anything like that because: Yes of cause, the software is much faster today but the reason for that is the processor itself too. If for instance the new processor has a new instruction set like SSE4.2 it can be used by the software if it is implemented. But how to weigh that in? Is it pos
  12. Man that is improvement ;). I am pretty sure it has to do with the improvements in A:M too, but still: Damn that is fast. Best regards *Fuchur*
  13. Hi Robert, I just tried it... a little under a minute at about 58-59s with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900x and A:M Version 19.0 p. I think it cuts the next best entry till now by Jason by about 16s for the teapot and is the first one under 1 minute :). (link: https://forums.hash.com/topic/36753-cpu-render-benchmark/page/8/) Best regards *Fuchur*
  14. Today I updated my CPU to a new AMD Ryzen 9 5900x with a new Mainboard (Asus Prime B550 Plus) and wanted to see how much that will help with rendering in A:M. The result: It is about 1.7x faster for single-core 180p rendering time: My AMD Ryzen 7 1700 was at around 19:12 with 180p single, the new 5900x is at 11:19. The rendertime for 360p single-core: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 was at 1h 17m 23s, the 5900x is at 45m 21s ...and of cause the 5900x has even more cores (12 core vs 8 cores) and does quite much better there too: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 was at 38m 34s, the 5900x is at
  15. I tried for a very long time to bring Affinty photo to run on my computer and laptop and the short answer is: Nope... it is very much trouble for many people out there as far as I understand it... just a very bad port from the Mac to the PC and it pretty much does not work for many people. I just stopped trying to get it to run. It just did not work out for me... I am not sure if they have trouble with anything but NVIDIA graphics or if it is about intel CPUs or something like that but it just did not work out. Best regards *Fuchur*
  16. You tried renaming the master0.lic in the installation folder to for instance "master1.bac" and after that try to open A:M again, right? Best regards *Fuchur*
  17. You can try this too: https://www.patchwork3d.de/start-am-netrender-185-en
  18. I currently own 3x 3d printers... one for PLA (Makerbot 2), one of ABS and PLA with two print heads, heated plate and so on (Makerbot 2x) and one is a resin printer (Elegoo Mars) but I constantly find myself going back to the PLA machine because it really is the most reliable and easy to use one... I just put it on, press print and in 95% it just does what it should do at the first try... in my experience PLA is pretty much on par with the ABS for most purposes while being less stinky, easier to handle and has a lot less shrinking and is much more predictable when cooling down. The only thing
  19. Any software that masks, changes or tries to alter the Mac adress or anything else like that on your Windows-PC or Mac?
  20. Hi everybody, I think everybody knows that and it just recently drove me nuts again... this small little stand for keyboards which break and a totally fine keyboard is just no longer pleasant to be used and you would need to throw it away which is totally wasteful if you ask me... So I bought a thousands of dollar 3d printer and printed something out to get over tha... Not really... it has been used in many, many instances like that over the last 7 years or so and I think it should be fine today especially if you count in the fun I had with it . Here is the result and the bro
  21. That just means, that your Firewall/Anti Virus/Windows Firewall is blocking it for whatever reason. I'll just download it for you and zip compress it. Have a look if you can download this one. I would say that you might want to put hash.com on your whitelist if it really does this. Sometimes they just put it in a blacklist because of "hash" in the URL for instance or in case of Microsoft security software, because Microsoft just wants to push the Microsoft store. Best wishes *Fuchur* AM_64BIT_v19o.zip
  22. i took the liberty to convert it to mp4 using MiroVideo Converter. evolutions04_web.mp4
  23. Ask Jason (support@hash.com) about it. If you have an active licence Jason can help you with that sort of problem. Best regards *Fuchur*
  24. You even designed an own label in Illustrator for the soap... Man that was just great to watch :). Best regards *Fuchur*
×
×
  • Create New...