robcat2075

Here, Roger, here's the post... hose.mov hose.zip

The buzz i've read suggests the retina display will use its denser res to render type more clearly with less obvious antialiasing. Aside from that, I'm doubtful people will be consuming more data with it unless they want to carry a magnifying glass with their iphone. But I've never seen one.

This sounds like crazy, crazy stuff If you can make a crash remember to do an AMreport on it with a sample PRJ

It is possible to resize and even re-proportion textures. That did work for me on an OBJ that I was uploading to p3d.in The baked map was rectangular. I resized it to a square in Photoshop (p3d.in requires a square of 1024x1024 or less) and it seemed to be applied appropriately.

Maybe Yves might see this and comment.

I'm looking at a 3-point patch in real time and the subdivision level just above the lowest sort of looks like maybe it's doing the Malo subdivision already. But that might just be real time. I have no idea really.

It's the same idea as Malo's but I moved the centerpoint to be more like a five-pointer.

You are right that triangle patches seem to be like a 4-sided patch with one side squished together. For smoothness, I think they seem to be more of a problem than 5-pointers. I don't know how much of a problem changing the internals of 3-pointers would cause for old models? I'd draw your subdivision more like this... In the beginning of... A:M! Of course CG had polygons long before A:M. I understand Martin's first program, Animation:Apprentice, used voxels but i don't know much about it.

Look in Fuchur's signature for links to useful tools.

I think FUchur has done some thinking on it. Someone has asked about it before. It may be something that is done via the .X exporter.

try this link to the top of the thread and go to post #6 http://www.hash.com/forums/index.php?s=&am...st&p=286136

I just tried the link you have there and it worked and the files worked too. Try it again, maybe it was an internet hiccup.

In your screen capture the "A" key is off. Could that be it? btw, v17 now has a visible warning for that situation.

I'll note that you can put a value smaller than 1.0 in the resolution slot to get smaller maps if you need them. I haven't quite figured out what the res number means for the res you get. It seems to vary depending on the model.

You can actually change the mesh in the UV view?

It seems not to work. That might be AMReport material

I'm not sure what that means either. Those have been around since v1 in 1992 or 1993. They may have been even earlier in Animation:Journeyman, but I know nothing of that program. I recall those being introduced sometime after v5, perhaps around 1997 Martin said once here that in the beginning there were no polygons at all, ever, it was ALL splines through the whole pipeline. Later, to improve render time, temporary subdivision of the patches was added. I don't understand it all. Based on Martins' comments, A:M's renderer seems to be a REYES renderer Possibly, but it would have to be for a fabulous reason.

When you can. I think they are going into the next release already, but the sooner we know something is wrong with them, the sooner it can be fixed in a further release. thanks!

I've tentatively revised some stock A:M characters that are used in early tuts for these reasons If you have some time could you download and install the "updated.zip" data set (found at AMReport 6203)and give those characters a test on basic things like posing the bones, using the sliders, doing a Paste-Mirror, and see if they perform as expected? Also see if they are showing up in the Library as expected. I know next to nothing about the workings of the Library. If they are good to go they'll replace the flawed ones that are in the basic A:M installer now.

That's lookin' fine, Mark!

That's a cute one!

I was taking a project back and forth between v16 and v17 and noticed that I couldn't see sprites in an on-screen progressive in v16 but I can see them in v17. They show up in shaded mode in both but v16 didn't show them in progressive render. Did that really not work in v16?

fabulous! Noticeable bags under the eyes.

We'll figure something out!

Good looking shot two ideas... -I think they would look more "there" if they cast a visible shadow on the ground -The copper parts would benefit from a much wider and somewhat weaker specular highlight.