CPU Render Benchmark

[jason1025]

But if you use bootcamp to partition your drive and dual boot into windows, AM is very stable.

[Roger]

Here are my results:

Best time was 2:13 on a Ryzen 3500U mobile processor.   I will test with my Threadripper 1950x system a bit later and post those results.

 

 

 

 

[jason1025]

Did  I do it? DO I have the All time fastest record?

AMD 3970x 32 core 64 threads

256GB DDR4 3200mhz ram

ASROCK TRX40 Creator motherboard

2x Gygabyte Radeon 5700xt GPUs

 

[Fuchur]

You should with that kind of system ;).

I think the king till now was 1:29 and you got it cut by 15s for single core again and I am pretty sure you would kill it for a multi-core benchmark like the following one with that machine. Looks like quite a beasty one – congratulations ;).

AM Bench 2017:

Benchmark: https://www.patchwork3d.de/am-bench-2017-201-en

Best regards
*Fuchur*

[robcat2075]

Very impressive!

[jason1025]

Cool the 1st 2 frames came in at 1:14, but the last frame was 1:15

[Shelton]

 CPU Benchmark - 1:03

AMD 5950X 16 cores 32 threads

4.25 ghz

32 gb of RAM

 

[Shelton]

 CPU Benchmark - 1:00

AMD 5950X 16 cores 32 threads

4.35 ghz

32 gb of RAM

I re ran the test since it was performed while on a Zoom call.  

 

[Fuchur]

Uh, the big guy: 5950x ;).
That one is a beast :). I am pretty sure that the zoom meeting was close to not mattering at all for a 16 core machine like that ;). You would have to run Netrender with at least 15 slaves (maybe even 30 or so) that it would make a big difference ;).

Best regards
*Fuchur*

[Shelton]

Well Here you go Intel I9 12900 with 32 gigs of ddr5 all NVMe drives Samsung 980s.  This is the 2009 bench mark

47 seconds a frame.  I am rendering the 2017 benchmark now and should have results shortly.  I redid the AMD 5950x and got 59 secs to 1:01 per frame.

[robcat2075]

53 seconds!

Steve @Shelton has gifted me with a fabulous new computer to further my A:M computing. Thank you, Steve!

At the very top of this thread, in 2009, that benchmark scene was taking 19 minutes and 59 seconds to render.

Now it's less than 1 minute!

 

[Shelton]

Robert 

That is the results I was getting as well when I tested.  That is wonderful results!!

The video card will be mailed by this weekend as well.

 

Steve

[robcat2075]

On 5/9/2022 at 6:52 PM, robcat2075 said:

53 seconds!

Steve @Shelton has gifted me with a fabulous new computer to further my A:M computing. Thank you, Steve!

At the very top of this thread, in 2009, that benchmark scene was taking 19 minutes and 59 seconds to render.

Now it's less than 1 minute!

 

 

I forgot the specs...

version: v19.5 (beta)

render time: 0:53

CPU Brand and model: Intel i7-12700K

Actual CPU speed in GHz: about 4.8GHz in this render

how many cores A:M is using: probably just one although CPU has 12

RAM: 32 GB!

OS: Windows 10

Computer also has a 500 GB NVMe SSD for the  C : drive

[Fuchur]

Computer also has a 500 MB NVMe SSD for the c : drive => GB hopefully ;).

[robcat2075]

30 minutes ago, Fuchur said:

Computer also has a 500 MB NVMe SSD for the 😄 drive => GB hopefully ;).

Fixed! And that smiley face should have been a "C:"

[Madfox]

Last time in 2013 it took winxp 23minutes. A new computer gives another result.

Windows 11 64bit
Intel Core i9 10900x @ 3.70GHz
10 cores 20 threads
AM v19 0.op SSE4

😊
 

[robcat2075]

@Madfox

One more setting to check is your computer's  Power Option. By default the OS is usually set to a power saving mode and the CPU never cranks up to its highest speed when it's just running mainly one core (Like A:M does)

 

NetRender calls up more cores and will usually crank up the CPU even when a power saving mode is selected.

 

[robcat2075]

Here is a modest new best for my machine, after trying some overclocking... 49 seconds.