sprockets Making and Using Drop-On Poses TinkeringGnome's Atomic Rings PRJ 2001 Star Gate effect in A:M with PRJ Comparison of AO and Radiosity Renders Animated Commercial by Soulcage Tralfaz's Lost In Space Robot Rodger Reynold's Architectural WIP
sprockets
Recent Posts | Unread Content
Jump to content
Hash, Inc. - Animation:Master

Least appealing 3D software ad I've seen today...


robcat2075

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • *A:M User*

I think someone is taking the piss, that can't be for real. Or maybe they are trying to be "hip" and show a retro look? That would be "omigosh high end graphics!" in 1985 maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think someone is taking the piss, that can't be for real. Or maybe they are trying to be "hip" and show a retro look? That would be "omigosh high end graphics!" in 1985 maybe.

 

I think this is a style thing... I have seen one or two images like that in ads... a photoreal model just does no longer look very much like 3d, since it can be mistake very easily for a photo... the solution is: Make it more visible ;).

Of course a 3d artist will run away in horror if he sees something like that ;).

 

See you

*Fuchur*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a style thing. I could imagine a whole short in this style where everything is realistically proportioned and physically based materials and rendering but facetted. I think that could actually look nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a style thing. I could imagine a whole short in this style where everything is realistically proportioned and physically based materials and rendering but facetted. I think that could actually look nice.

 

Works for me... but I like BUS FUMES, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doing some googling, apparently this is indeed a new "in" thing with style.

 

Do a Google search for "polygon portrait."

 

It's done in vector programs over a photo. They essentially draw out a wireframe over the face and then use a single color from within each "polygon" to fill them. The result is this facetted look that makes me think of Bizarro Superman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Hash Fellow

Whoops! Prices are increasing! Graphics quality not increasing.

 

autodesk2.JPG

 

 

This time I clicked on it. I kind of suspected it might be a scam-reseller site, not authorized by Autodesk.

 

But no... it went to an actual autodesk.com page. :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • *A:M User*

Why anyone would buy Maya over AM, I do not know. I've never actually used Maya (although I have used Alias, wayyyyy back when the land was young and so was I) so maybe there is something there that is worth paying $185/month for.

 

As much as I dislike subscription fees, AMs is at least reasonable. The only way it would be more reasonable is if you could somehow have a license you could move between systems, but only use one copy of. Like if it was on a usb key or something.

 

But for the price of one month of Maya, you can get 2 copies of AM! For a whole year! And have money left over for lunch. How cool is that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Hash Fellow

I recall when I worked at Nortel we had a license for Alias Animator. It had been purchased for a very ill-advised venture into something called "VR" which I was not a part of, but after the smoke cleared Alia Animator was still there in our office.

 

This was around 1998 or so. It was a $30,000 program that ran on a $60,000 SGI "workstation."

 

I gave it a try but I was dumbfounded... what did it have that A:M v5 didn't have? Maybe there was something but I couldn't detect anything notable and everything was harder and more tedious than in A:M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • *A:M User*
I recall when I worked at Nortel we had a license for Alias Animator. It had been purchased for a very ill-advised venture into something called "VR" which I was not a part of, but after the smoke cleared Alia Animator was still there in our office.

 

This was around 1998 or so. It was a $30,000 program that ran on a $60,000 SGI "workstation."

 

I gave it a try but I was dumbfounded... what did it have that A:M v5 didn't have? Maybe there was something but I couldn't detect anything notable and everything was harder and more tedious than in A:M.

 

Alias version 9 was the last one I used. It was not terribly easy to use. My favorite part was that it was a $30k program with several plug-ins that cost $5k-$10k a piece. So you spent $30,000 but still needed to spend more if you wanted all the super-cool features.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...