Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted January 14, 2013 Hash Fellow Share Posted January 14, 2013 real pendulum are not floppy, but some animation school somewhere says they are. Here's one way to do it with minimal keyframing and mostly curve-editing... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve392 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Thats a very nice tut Robert ,thank;s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NancyGormezano Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Well done! Lots of good insight in there (eg, all curves are the same at beginning, use of the rotate manipulator, copy/paste of multiple bones/keyframes at once, lag, overlap, translating curves in curve editor). Might be interesting at some point to contrast the resultant motion with a dynamic constraint, and playing with the settings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Very nice indeed... very informative ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serg2 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Interesting method! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Would there be a way to do something similar with a constraint? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted January 15, 2013 Author Hash Fellow Share Posted January 15, 2013 Would there be a way to do something similar with a constraint? Certainly you could get something similar with a dynamic constraint The real goal of an exercise like this is to further the student's understanding of what you can do in the curve editor to control the motion of things. Most things can't be animated with automatic physics but most keyframe animation can assisted with knowledgeable curve editing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 On a project I'm doing I may need to use this ..a boat model with swaying objects..just to figure out which way might work best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnl3d Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 great tutorial Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted January 16, 2013 Author Hash Fellow Share Posted January 16, 2013 On a project I'm doing I may need to use this ..a boat model with swaying objects..just to figure out which way might work best. for trappings on a boat, I think dynamic constraints would be easier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NancyGormezano Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I went ahead and tried the dynamic constraint route for myself to see the resultant curves. The simulation produces more variation than a hand done one. I found I had to fiddle with the constraint settings to get something that looks fluid (made stiffness = 10%, drag = 20%, use gravity = OFF). Here's resultant baked curves of bone1, 2, 3, with a movie of the motion and the baked project. It is also harder to tweak/modify the resultant curves from a simulation. But it is possible. tailtestsNULLbakedembed.prj taildynamiclow2twiceh264loop.mov Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted January 16, 2013 Author Hash Fellow Share Posted January 16, 2013 Great cow tail, Nancy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.