3DArtZ Posted December 19, 2007 Posted December 19, 2007 Hey guys, following my tests with displacment for folds in clothing, I discovered that no matter how I altered my settings I can not avoid getting these little black dots where the displament map is on the model. I am thinking that the dots are pixels that are brighter then the surrounding pixels in the gradient of the blur that I used on the map and the toon renderer is pickign it up as an edge. is that possible? or is it a compression thing? I've tried both png(profile stripped after ps save) and tga files. any help or suggestions would be appreciated here is an image sowing the problem. Quote
Luuk Steitner Posted December 19, 2007 Posted December 19, 2007 This image is reduced in size. Are the black dots on the original render perfect squares or are they smooth? If they are squares it's a render error. I have had such problems in v14 some time ago and I was hoping it was solved by now. It might be something else tough. Quote
3DArtZ Posted December 19, 2007 Author Posted December 19, 2007 Hey Luuk, the dots appear to be actual toon lines, if I turn off lines the dots go away. as far as them being perfect squares or circles, I can not tell, they are just dots. Quote
Darkwing Posted December 19, 2007 Posted December 19, 2007 Being about the toonrender, this brings a question I've had, I have a project of a train. I have a smoke particle sprite for the exhaust, but for it to be higher than the train, I have a transparent cylinder emitting the sprites, but when toon rendered, there is an outline around the object, any ideas? As for the dots, I think it's subtle displacements in the modle that disappear in normal render, but in toon, it puts lines there cause it senses a difference in the model Quote
Luuk Steitner Posted December 19, 2007 Posted December 19, 2007 If those areas are considered to be edges maybe a higher resolution displacement map would help, or maybe lower.... Maybe it's worth a try. Quote
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted December 19, 2007 Hash Fellow Posted December 19, 2007 Are the dots lined up with a spline? Quote
3DArtZ Posted December 19, 2007 Author Posted December 19, 2007 If those areas are considered to be edges maybe a higher resolution displacement map would help, or maybe lower.... Maybe it's worth a try. Hi Luuk, Ive had the same thought process on that. I've tried up to 300 dpi and down to 30 dpi and they were pretty much the same. also kept it at 72 dpi and make the image h x w up to triple in size. I'm about to give up!!!!! Are the dots lined up with a spline? Um, I don't know if they are exactly on a spline or not. how could I tell? I have had all sorts of results with dots all over the place and just a few dots, but there are always dots! Quote
Luuk Steitner Posted December 20, 2007 Posted December 20, 2007 I think I have a solution for you, don't give up yet. Make the parts where the dots are showing a separate group and give it it's own toon settings. Setting the toon lines thickness to '0' for example. Quote
3DArtZ Posted December 20, 2007 Author Posted December 20, 2007 Luuk, you are right in that is removes the dots, as any dot shows up with the color of the surface, making them appear to be not there, but I lose the outline around the body on the group part. Let me know if you find anything different. thanks! Mike Quote
3DArtZ Posted December 20, 2007 Author Posted December 20, 2007 Okay, here is a the problem in motion. on the map, white being the hiegest point, and 50 percent black being skin level, the dots showup in the blur between the 2 colors. the gradient. anyone have any thoughts how to uniformily smooth this out, as I think that pixels of brighter color in the way photoshop makes the transition in color is to blame?? about 900kb http://www.3dartz.com/vids/kickit12a.mov Quote
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted December 20, 2007 Hash Fellow Posted December 20, 2007 If you rendered that movie a 2x the res would the dots be the same relative size or the same absolute size (the same number of pixels across)? Quote
3DArtZ Posted December 21, 2007 Author Posted December 21, 2007 If you rendered that movie a 2x the res would the dots be the same relative size or the same absolute size (the same number of pixels across)? Hi Robert, don't know the ans. to that. I will give a try and let you know. Quote
3DArtZ Posted December 21, 2007 Author Posted December 21, 2007 Hey Robert, I just did a larger render and the dots still show up. I guess that the toon render picks up the brighter or darker pixels that are in the gradient of the map. Not sure what else to try.... Quote
3DArtZ Posted December 21, 2007 Author Posted December 21, 2007 here is a larger quicktime movie about 900kb http://www.3dartz.com/vids/hdkicker2.mov Quote
HomeSlice Posted December 21, 2007 Posted December 21, 2007 The only thing I can think of is to find a frame that always shows the dots, note the displacement percentage of the map on that frame, bring the model into a new non-animated chor, set the displacement percentage (in the chor), export the chor as a ply model, import the ply model back into AM and see if the mesh in the imported ply model is doing anything strange. I would guess if the mesh is distorted, then maybe the problem is in the map, but if the mesh looks fine, maybe it is a rendering issue? Just guessing.... Quote
3DArtZ Posted December 21, 2007 Author Posted December 21, 2007 Homeslice, you lost me for moment! I think its the map and by that I mean, either I'm screwing something up or the gradient tool just isnt able to make a smoothenough transition in that random pixels that are brighter or darker then the majority of the surrounding pixels are getting caught in the toon render as an edge. Is 32 bit the max in photoshop/gimp now a days?(ive tried both) Quote
3DArtZ Posted December 21, 2007 Author Posted December 21, 2007 Okay, I'm really about to toss my hands up in the air. I guess I can always use a bump map. here is a quick a render I did with one. Its not bad, but I'd really like to use the displacement map:( http://www.3dartz.com/vids/hdkickerASD1.mov Quote
mtpeak2 Posted December 21, 2007 Posted December 21, 2007 To tell you the truth, I think I like bump map better. That is what you used in the last render, right? Quote
3DArtZ Posted December 22, 2007 Author Posted December 22, 2007 hey mark, yeah, I used a bump map in the last render I posted. It think it looks ok, and possibly it would be find during animation unless someone stopped the animation and examined the edges and such. Quote
HomeSlice Posted December 22, 2007 Posted December 22, 2007 Homeslice, you lost me for moment! I think its the map and by that I mean, either I'm screwing something up or the gradient tool just isnt able to make a smooth enough transition Sorry about that. Several years ago I discovered that when I exported a model with a displacement map as a ply model, the displacement would get "baked" into the mesh geometry. I used to apply displacement maps, export as ply, import the ply back into AM and save the imported ply as a mdl file. It worked great but that was a long time ago. I don't know if that would work now. In fact, it probably doesn't work that way anymore. Quote
Ganthofer Posted December 23, 2007 Posted December 23, 2007 Exporting a model with displacement map as any of the export formats bakes the displament into the geometry in v15 alpha. Didn't try the older versions. Of course the results will vary, depending on how well your mesh exports and imports. Glenn Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.