sprockets Learn to keyframe animate chains of bones. Gerald's 2024 Advent Calendar! The Snowman is coming! Realistic head model by Dan Skelton Vintage character and mo-cap animation by Joe Williamsen Character animation exercise by Steve Shelton an Animated Puppet Parody by Mark R. Largent Sprite Explosion Effect with PRJ included from johnL3D
sprockets
Recent Posts | Unread Content
Jump to content
Hash, Inc. - Animation:Master

Recommended Posts

Posted

Whenever I render something it turns out fuzzy. In the quick render is is crystal clear, but the actual render is pixelated. Any ideas as to why this is happening?

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

Maybe you can show a render or your settings? Fuzzy could mean you have turned on depth of field, pixelated could mean single pass render without anti aliasing.

In the render options dialog you can choose to use the settings from that dialog or the current camera. That can explain why your results are different.

Posted

The image you posted doesn't look fuzzy at all to me. It looks sharp and clear. How are you viewing it? If it is a rendered animation and you view it at full screen... it's going to look fuzzy.

 

-vern

Posted

Hmmm... Out on a limb here but did you add a blur post effect to the camera? The pic look fine to me though.

 

[Offtopic]

Go Mac Users!!!!

[/offtopic]

 

-Photoman

Posted

I did a render without a rotoscope and it was fine but as soon as I put a rotoscope in there it got all fuzzy. Is AM just rendering at the same rez as the picture?

Posted

What part of the image is a rotoscope? Can we see a side by side comparison? Fuzzy and not fuzzy? When I look at your sample at the size it is rendered at it is not fuzzy... at least the skull and rocks up front are not fuzzy. The edges and detail are sharp at that resolution. A rotoscope is an image. If you render it larger than the original resolution it will be fuzzy.

 

-vern

Posted

Yes, an image would be helpful. As others say, the image looks crisp enough to me. If it's not your monitor try rendering the rotoscope out at twice the resolution of the image it'll be in image it's a roto in.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...