sprockets Live Answer Time Demo Tinkering Gnome's Sparkler PRJ Shelton's new Char: Hans It's just donuts by ItsJustMe 3D Printing Free model: USS Midnight Rodger Reynolds' 1950s Street Car
sprockets
Recent Posts | Unread Content
Jump to content
Hash, Inc. - Animation:Master

Roger

*A:M User*
  • Posts

    1,968
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    38

Posts posted by Roger

  1. And one last word about the budget laptops using the low-end dual cores (generally at the sub $300 price point):   they tend to be lower power than a dual core system from back in the day.   An AMD E-120 was a popular chip to put in budget laptops, but it is a sub 2ghz dual core chip.    Other things that they do with these lower end systems to save on costs is they use single channel instead of dual channel RAM, slower 5400rpm hard drives (unless they use flash, in which case they tend to use a lower emmc flash module) and other measures to keep the costs down. 

    If budget is really tight you're better off getting a used higher end system with a discrete chip that won't cause problems with AM, or trying to get a more modern budget system that makes fewer compromises. 

  2. 25 minutes ago, robcat2075 said:

    That has the Intel graphics however... which sometimes works and sometimes doesn't for A:M.

     I have bad news:   virtually every laptop, that isn't advertised as a gaming laptop or workstation/desktop replacement laptop, has Intel graphics.   That is how they keep the prices so low. 

    With that in mind, Mark might be best served getting a laptop with a Ryzen 2500u or Ryzen 2700u, those are mobile chips with Vega graphics.   They should be quite suitable for mobile AM work, but unfortunately I have never tested these personally. 

  3. 9 hours ago, robcat2075 said:

    Now that I see it's an Intel "Pentium"... that seems pretty primitive.

    I didn't know they were still making Pentiums.

     

    What are some other options for a cheap windows laptop?

    That was my main concern with the laptop Mark posted, that is a lower-end chip I'm pretty sure.  

    If he doesn't mind going used, he can get an X220 with a 1 year warranty for right around $200, I think this one might even have a tablet mode.   Throw in an AM license and he is still under $300. 

     

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/Lenovo-Thinkpad-X230-12-5-INTEL-CORE-I5-3230M-2-60GHZ-8GB-128Gb-WINDOWS-10-PRO/222499822453?hash=item33ce05db75:rk:24:pf:0

     

  4. 28 minutes ago, robcat2075 said:

    I dunno... I used A:M for years with 2GB and twos core including all my AnimationMentor exercises and all of my TWO scenes and I rarely felt the computer was under powered.. That was with Windows 2K.

    About ten years ago I moved up to a quad core with 4GB and windows 7 (because A:M wouldn't run on Win2K anymore) and that was fully functional for A:M.  Now I have 8GB in it but I never really went past the first 4 until I tried rendering things for huge resolutions or with huge bitmaps.

    Does the Mac have a system monitor so you could see how much RAM you are using when you are doing your A:M things?

    Yeah but Win 2k is much lighter on system resources than what Win 10 is.   Win 2k I think will work with a minimum of 128 to 256mb RAM where Win 10 has a minimum requirement of 2GB.    So Win 2k with 2GB is using much less of the total system RAM than a Win 10 system with 2 or 4GB. 

    2 cores is probably just fine for AM on the go but I'd try for sure to get a minimum of 4gb RAM and either an i3 or i5 dual core.   Ideally you would want whatever cpu you get to have a fairly high base clock speed.   

  5. The Costco laptop would probably be adequate but just barely.    You really wouldn't be able to put much of anything but AM on it, for sure.   

    I would try to get at least 8gb  RAM, a quad core Intel or AMD cpu, and a 1080p display panel.   If you don't have a full keyboard with numpad, you will want a plug in USB numpad for AM use.    

    I don't know that I would want to try and use a dual core with 4gb, you might be ok with it at first but I think you'd become frustrated over time.   

  6. This question came up in Live Answer Time today and I thought I would post the official word from Hash (link is to store page):

    Can A:M use multiple cores? A:M is currently not fully multi-core-optimized. However A:M is able through Netrender (included for free in v16.0 and up) to use multiple cores for rendering.  OpenMP is used to utilize multiple cores for several operations. More operations are altered to use multiple cores in each update.  Since A:M is a rendering application, it is recommended to use a CPU as fast as possible to decrease rendering time.

    So if you have an 8 core system, base AM may not make full use of all 8 cores however if you pick up an additional 4 or 10 netrender nodes for the nominal cost of $10 or $15,  you can utilize the other cores as background render nodes. 

    So those of you contemplating Threadripper/Ryzen/Ryzen 3000 updates may find this useful info.   

    *EDIT:   I should add,  most programs are not fully massively-threaded aware yet.   I expect that to change over time, but for right now Netrender is the best way to make use of those extra cores.  

    • Thanks 2
  7. 2 hours ago, Wildsided said:

    You're not the only one, Roger. From what I've read and from  personal opinion, the general consensus among fans seems to be that this has been a very weak season.

    Not to mention that the Christmas special has been bumped to New Years. 

    As for hitting her stride, the rumour doing the rounds is that both Jodie Whittaker and new show runner Chris Chibnall plan to leave at the end of next years season. So if that's the case she best be hitting it pretty fast.

    WOW.   They play up this whole "first female Doctor" thing and then she is leaving the role so quickly?  Yeah I don't think that they are going to pull it out if she's only got one more season after this one.   I didn't always care for Moffat's writing but I feel like they could have done some really interesting stuff with a female Doctor and instead we are getting these weak episodes.    I'd say face her off against The Master/ Missy but they've had so many Master specific plots in recent history I don't know how that would work.  

  8. Well so far we are what, like 6 or 7 episodes in?   I don't know but so far I've not been terribly impressed, I am not sure when this Doctor is going to hit her stride. 
    Plus, the writing just seems *off* somehow, it doesn't seem like classic Who.    Maybe I need to give it more time, but so far I'm not feeling it. 

×
×
  • Create New...