-
Posts
3,827 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by largento
-
-
You can put them into folders if you want to have them more organized and not see so many at once.
-
Jay Silverheels actually was Canadian. He got the nickname when he was a Lacrosse player. They called him Silverheels Smith.
-
Thanks, Rodney.
Didn't think it would be mysterious...
Tonto=Stubtoe
:-)
-
I had read somewhere before that the MGM lion's roar had been digitized to create something they could trademark.
I find it curious that the examples for the Lone Ranger are both voiced by William Conrad who only voiced the character for the Filmation TV series in the early '80s.
-
-
Just playing around to see what I could do via A:M and Photoshop.
Here's one of your images. I took it into Photoshop and did a few things. The great thing is that you can bring in an image sequence in Photoshop and apply these changes (non permanently) to the whole video rather than having to do a frame at a time.
There are lots of LUTs out there that you can use to achieve different looks. I bought a bunch during a sale at Film Riot and they are named for the various movies they try to emulate.
Here's another test. I created a material from that concrete image you mentioned and used it to color the mini-figure. I also attached an environment map texture (the model doesn't have any specularity settings.) The top is how I rendered it and the bottom after I played with it to try to make it look like it was on film. Bear in mind, I think everything should look like it was filmed in 1966, so that influences what I do. :-) You can experiment endlessly with what you're doing in Photoshop to get the look you like.
I'm just offering up that post-effects may help you to achieve what you're looking for.
- 1
-
High Dynamic Range (HDR) is frequently used for two different things I've noticed:
HDR photos are composite photos that make use of different images. If you have a figure standing in front of a window, you take multiple exposures so that you have some where the outside appears correctly and some where the figure appears correctly. When composited, you get the appearance that you would expect your eye to have. In truth, they always look far more saturated with color than what you're used to. They are beautiful images, but they are a trick, as they are don't add any color levels to your device.
HDR is also used for the color levels and contrast ratios that a screen can display. It's not about your monitor recreating the light levels of the sun, but how well it can handle darks and lights and the gamut of colors. HDR makes for a much more beautiful and realistic image, but it's limited by hardware. There's no trickery here. The image looks better because you have more color and light information being displayed.
BTB, a CRT allows for a maximum luminance of 100cd/m-squared. An LCD monitor ranges between 250 to 350 cd/m-squared, so there really is a difference. :-)
-
-
Beautiful!
- 1
-
Unfortunately, except for some key books, I don't think there's a great market for selling books like there once was. The initial increase in value for comics had more to do with Baby Boomers suddenly having cash in the 80s/90s and being nostalgic for books they had when they were kids that their moms had thrown away.
I did work one convention next to a dealer and he said that there is a group of books that they look for. I don't recall the term he used, but basically they were display-worthy. The ones that they would use to draw people to their booths. Those they would pay decent prices for, but everything else was just filler.
I wouldn't think that selling your collection to a comic book store would be a good idea. I tried selling some of my more valuable issues when I first came out to Dallas and it's an experience that still makes me want to puke. I would later have flashbacks of it every time I watched "Pawn Stars." Yeah, this book is worth $75, but I gotta' hold onto it until somebody willing to pay that much comes in, so I'll give you $2. It was a nightmare.
My guess has always been that it would be more profitable to try to sell the books individually (or in sets) online, but I've had no experience doing that. It certainly would be time-consuming. If it was the early 90s during the speculator boom, you could sell them for big bucks, but that boat sank.
I'd try to bypass the middle-man and sell straight to the collector. Maybe advertise on craigslist or look for a comic book collecting forum or facebook group.
-
There's a free app out there called Hitfilm Express. I've not used it, but it seems to do a lot of AE-type things.
-
Looking back at the thread, it was an empty rotocontainer tag. I assume on Windows you can do the same, but I searched my drive for files that contained that string. This gave me a list of files to delete the empty container from. Tedious, but it solved the problem. Nancy also describes how it happens, so you can avoid doing that.
-
I had a problem like this once. It seems to me it was a sort of bug that every time I opened an infected file it duplicated. I'd have to search it out, but I believe I had to go back to the files I'd made and open them in a text editor and delete something. Once I'd gotten them all, everything was fine.
Here's the thread:
https://www.hash.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=37592&hl=rotoscope
-
Awesome! Thanks!
-
Just a head's up. I installed the SSE 4.2 version for OSX and it results in my NOT being able to open the application due to a missing library. I was able to re-install v19C and that works fine. I've made a report.
-
Thanks, Robert. Sounds like the fix I'm looking for.
-
With 2018 starting, it's time for me to make another short and it looks like I'm doing a parody of the Lone Ranger. It's something I've wanted to do for a long time now. I've reached the point that I'm really just making these for myself, so I'm not worried about trying to find an audience anymore. :-)
I've got an enormous amount of work ahead of me, but I think it's going to be fun creating stuff for the Old West. Here's some of the progress so far...
- 1
-
Happy New Year's! Here's to a GREAT 2018!
-
Merry Christmas!
-
Thanks, guys. I'm not sure if the guy was thrilled with it. He said he liked it (repeatedly, like he was trying to convince me). :-) ...BUT, he hasn't shared it on social media. It could be that he's waiting until closer when the film will be released, but I suspect he might be one of those people who doesn't have a sense of humor and may be embarrassed by the caricature. I hope my intuition is wrong, but if he didn't want funny, he came to the wrong fellow. :-)
-
A guy who does Star Trek fan films (and I mean a LOT of them) caught me at the right time about doing a poster for one of his movies. I expected it to have Star Trek stuff on it, but no such luck. :-)
I wanted to make something that looked decent, but not require too much work. I'm not sure how much I succeeded on either aspect, but I think it came out pretty cool.
Since it was an evil-twin scenario, I only had to model one figure and I actually just used the same model and changed the jacket and hat color in the Cho.
I ended up doing two poses and liked the heads in the first one and the bodies in the second, so I rendered out just the heads with an alpha channel and the bodies without heads with an alpha channel and put the heads on in Photoshop.
I ended up not making the hands part of the model. I just made one hand model and placed them in Cho to approximate where I wanted the hands to go. When the model was rigged with arms, I positioned them to connect with the hands and adjusted the hands where I needed to.
I swiped the hat from the Glenn character I made for "The Wobbling Dead." :-)
- 2
-
Not only brings the X-Men characters (and the word "mutant" that couldn't be used) into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but also, the springboard of the Marvel Universe, the Fantastic Four. Also makes me wonder if they might stick the Fox Fanfare back at the beginning of future Star Wars films. Just doesn't seem the same without it.
-
I'm not positive, but I don't believe so. I had stopped using JPGs (in favor of PNGs), so I didn't notice when the problem first occurred. It was only in instances where I tried to use old materials that had jpegs in them and eventually figured it out. I can't speak for every image type, since I rarely use anything but PNG files. The workaround I used was just to change the images from JPGs to PNGs and work that way. It was annoying since I still liked to grab images off the net for reference and I'd have to convert them before I could place them up as rotoscopes. As far as I've tried, everything seems to work fine in v19.
-
Simon, are those images jpegs? I want to say that v18 was the one that we noticed couldn't open jpegs on the Mac. It was fixed, but I think it was fixed in v19.
Does '2008 - Rig' work in latest version of A:M?
in 2008 - Rig
Posted
I just installed it and it worked fine for me. First time I'd ever done it. I'm using v 19.D.