Rodney

Makes me thing of Doc Brown from 'Back to the Future'!

Yeah, I see he's raised it to $79 for today. Says it'll rise again (toward the full price of $129 I assume) tomorrow.... maybe $99 tomorrow? Those that don't get access to resources like this often still benefit though... through osmosis. There have been a lot of shared resources over the years and we (collectively) gain knowledge from those. Aside: Quite awhile back I was postulating about an A:M Foundation of sorts. This is somewhat what I'm talking about in that esteemed body could release grants and such that would 'gift' resources like these to talented folks in the community like yourself. It's a tall order and no small matter to run such a foundation but one could dream of a day where a majority of (mostly financial) obstacles to learning animation are removed. Money is an important thing... I don't want to downplay it... and it's got its proper place in the exchange of goods and services. But the idea is for the entire community to benefit from limited resources. One of those 'take a weakness and turn it into a strength' approaches. Now as to computers going nuts and not letting folks in on deals that should not be missed... I see that as a sign the deal was worth passing up at that moment. Not all good things are expedient nor fit for every purpose. No hard sells from me folks. There are lots of resources out there!

I hadn't had a chance to download your last videos. I must say that I don't see much of a difference between the two. Perhaps I did something wrong on my end downloaded the same file... I do note those unrendered pixels are showing up here and there in the smoke and I hope that is just a fluke. I've attached a side by side comparison of the two. But this is mostly neither here nor there. The important thing being that you are getting the results you want! comparison.mov

I didn't spend a lot of time creating the alpha channel... so it's mostly just there to test the theory. If tweaked enough via opacity etc. it turns out pretty decent though but 'as is' the images have hard edges where the alpha channel whites/blacks meet. Sorry about that! Here's part of a test I have rendering out now that uses those two images: smoke and fire.mp4

Nice! Maybe an artifact from where the looping stops and restarts?

Here's one for smoke... The original tutorial may have used a selected key color (black?) instead of alpha channel transparency. The key color isn't as robust as alpha channel and so was mostly deprecated in more recent versions of A:M. smokev18.tga

You might try the attached image as a sprite image and see if it makes a difference. I note that an image from a tutorial that may be the same as yours doesn't have an alpha channel in it even though it is TGA format. flames_v18.tga

No spare cash or just not in the mood to buy stuff? Don't dispair! Aaron has lots of free tutorials online as well. Here's a recent one of him exploring TV Paint (but the lessons apply to stopmotion and digital animation in A:M too): Dialog animation 'Stop it!'

We live in a wonderful time where we have access to great information about the process of animation. I'm not trying to sell you anything but.. if you've got a spare $50 laying around... do yourself a favor and buy this. At regular price of $129 this'd still be a good deal but at $49... the only reason not to buy is if you've got a dial-up internet phone connection. Aaron Blaise is someone I've posted links to before (see his 'Aaron's Art Tips) and he's recently released a 'complete course' in animation. He takes his experience as a Disney animator and outlines the principles of animation and walks through the process step by step. I've just now purchased this and started watching the gigabytes of videos in the course (high quality I might add). We live in a wonderful time where we have access to great information about the process of animation. If you've got a lot of tutorials on animation already some of the lessons will be familiar but the approach (hand drawn animation) is something that computer animators need. Included in the course: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fundamentals of Animation Course In this comprehensive course, master animator Aaron Blaise ("The Lion King", "Brother Bear", "Mulan") takes you through the key principles of animation. This course covers the "12 Principles of Animation" as originally pioneered by the original "9 Old Men" who worked directly under Walt Disney. This course includes 13 HD Video Tutorials covering: Squash & Stretch Timing Solid Drawing Anticipation Follow Through + Overlapping Action Arcs "Slow Ins" & "Slow Outs" Straight Ahead Animation Pose to Pose Animation Secondary Action Staging Exaggeration Appeal PLUS A full lesson on Biped (Two Legged) Walk cycle animation PLUS A full tutorial on Bipedal Run animation Whether you are a traditional animator or work in computer animation this course is for you! We know you'll learn something new! Animation "Scene Approach" Course In this comprehensive course, animator and director Aaron Blaise ("The Lion King", "Aladdin", "Beauty and the Beast") takes you through his approach to animating a scene. Watch as Aaron creates new original animation right in front of you and explains his process for tackling an animated scene. You'll get6 HD Tutorial Videos and learn from his insights on: Scene Approach Thumbnailing & Sketching Character Design Pose Tests Animating Dialogue Mouth Shapes How the "Fundamentals of Animation" apply to an actual scene Breakdowns, In-betweens and Arcs A Complete Animation Demonstration This is a truly unique and original opportunity to learn from a great animator as he teaches you the techniques that were directly passed to him by master Disney animators. We hope you enjoy it. Whether you are a traditional animator or work in CGI we know you'll learn something new! Bonus & Supplemental Lessons As a BONUS for purchasing the Complete Animation Course we have included a variety of bonus and supplemental files. ENJOY! List of Bonus Files: Baseball Pitch Animation VIDEO Baseball Throw “Physics of Animation” PDF Handout Bear Expression Drawings Bear Animation JPEGS (For you to print out and “flip” if you wish to) Bouncing Ball JPEGS Mouth Shapes Jpegs - Breaking down several key sound/mouth shapes to help you Squash and Stretch PDF Handout Animation "Glossary" & FAQ Access TV Paint Source Files: Bounching Ball Character Squash and Stretch “Breakdowns, In-betweens and Arcs” Demo Bear Animation - Fully In-betweened Baseball Throw/Pitch NOTE: This bonus material is NOT available for individual purchase and may only be acquired with the "COMPLETE ANIMATION COURSE" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The price is said to return to $129 tomorrow. You can find out more here: https://creatureartteacher.com/product/complete-animation-course/

Thanks Will! I know I've got a lot of work ahead but praise from you makes me all giddy inside. It gives me hope to keep pressing on in this crazy world of animation. Hey, does that mean I get the bonus points for 'GET HIT IN THE HEAD WITH AN AXE!'?

For PC users... If you use ImageMagick (or have it installed on your system) I created a little utility program to convert a directory full of PNG images into a GIF animation. It's pretty no frills but has the following features: - Converts a directory of PNG images into a GIF animation - Preserves transparency (most gif converters do not) - Works if setup properly from the Tools/Customize menu in A:M (so converting renders from A:M to gif is a quick process). - Allows user to enter a name for the converted gif animation (pressing the enter key results in only the date/time stamp being retained as filename) -- If entered, the name will be added in front of a date/time stamp (currently no option to bypass the date/time stamp but this can be added) Disclaimers/Troubleshooting: *This is just a fun utility I put together to save me time in converting files to gif animation. No claim of any kind is implied. Use at own risk. *Imagemagick must be installed on the system. The exe simply automates what you'd have to input manually at the command prompt with Imagemagick The specific command used for conversion is: convert -delay 0 -loop 0 -dispose previous *.png %new_name%%fullstamp%.gif Do not use this utility on essential files (when in doubt use copies) *This executable must be in the same directory as the PNG files (I use these utilities with a static Renderfolder file system). The Date/Time stamp hasn't been tested on international systems (the date/time method might not work outside of North America) *I haven't had any issues with this utility but this is no guarantee that you will not. Attached is the first sequence of images I successfully converted with the utility via the Tools menu in A:M. PNG2AGif.zip

Mark may be on to something here.

The Tiffs are just screenshots of what he is seeing.

Thanks for the response Robert. Yeah, the issue is as I stated above where multiple Projects may have a material named 'Material1' but they are in fact very different materials. Only the names are the same. The same can be assumed for any asset that keeps the default name (Action1, Action2, Choreography 1, etc.. I had a little success with Transforming a Project into a Chor via a text editor and that could lead to an easier collecting via import of the Chors. I messed up though in that once I imported the Chor into a new (empty) Project I forgot to save and A:M crashed because of the little things that I hadn't accounted for. Saving the Project should allow A:M to automatically repair those as they aren't essential to any Project.

Here's an example of A:M particles (the resulting images that is) working in other programs. Note that I used Fusion to comp the particles because it takes awhile to open and setup After Effects (doing that now). This test also uses the PNG format (as as means to get the animated gif with transparency) so PNG does work... I just don't recommend the format if use can be avoided in the early stages. As you can see the transparency is maintained all the way through the pipeline. In this test, I rendered the particles out of A:M using the TGA format. Click on image for animation.

I converted your Tiff images to PNG as Tiff isn't a browser friendly format and folks may not want to download to see the images. I'll have to refresh my memory here but... if you can supply one of the original images/frames from your sequence put into After Effects that will help. At a guess I'd say there is a setting you'll need to adjust in After Effects but there may be something you can do on A:M's side as well. Added: Make sure you are rendering out of A:M with a format that will properly save the Alpha Channel. I recommend TGA or EXR. PNG will usually work but is not as robust a format for use with compositing. Formats to avoid (unless you plan to add a mask to act in the place of the Alpha Channel) include: BMP and JPG. AVI doesn't store transparency and while the Quicktime format stores the alpha channel it's usually to use image sequences.

Late night thinking here so bear with me... The term 'best method' is relative here but I'm looking to find a good way to combine a whole lot of Project files (hundreds?) into one single Project file. There are some difficulties in this. One of the primary obstacles: Same name assets (i.e. materials named material1 in more one project etc.) Those may have to be dealt with on a case by case basis. One method that works fairly well: Embed everything in the Project and then save as a Choreography Do this for each Project Import all the Chors into one Project (I tested this with good results but I believe an important step will be to rename all assets before exporting to Chor to indicate what part of the new Project they belong to. I believe this has the downside of not exporting any asset in the Project that is NOT in the current Chor. Those assets would not be transferrred.) I'm curious if I'm missing something simple here. For instance, can we import a Project into another Project? Going the text editing route is an alternative but with that approach the chance of breaking stuff increases dramatically. A similar approach might be to use a text merge tool (i.e. with Notepad++) and keep those parts of the file that are required.

I like. That one reminds me of your freezing effect. Now you've got me trying to recall how to apply an effector to one object without it effecting the other without resorting to compositing multiple renderings. For instance, effecting Thom but not the ground...

I'm embarrassed to post this but it's all I could salvage of my all-in-one sequence and I said I would post it. The feature I was testing was 'set camera from bird's eye (view)'. I like that! This was something of a no-frills approach. The scene setup uses: - The default ground plane (I wanted to see if I could make it into sanddunes) - Three lights (a sun and bulb/point light to light Tar and an additional point light to light the hyenas) - Not that you can tell from the posted animation but the entire sequence consists of one moving camera that moves around Tar and then zooms in on the hyenas -- I didn't manage to get a long enough sequence at the beginning to show Tar actually picking up the axe... although it's staged for that. I figure he's got a bunch of weapons laying there at his feet and he chooses the axe - I (obviously) didn't put much into the hyena's movement so it's mostly blocking the action out. I'd like to see a bit of reaction in the hyena leader's arms and hands that would signal that his brain stopped functioning upon impact with the axe. - The hyena sequence reminds me a little of the look of early 1970's japanese stop motion (like those Johnny Socko - Giant Robot reruns). Perhaps the lighting also has something to do with that. Edit: I should have mentioned that the herky-jerky look of the animation is due to deleting the majority of bad frames out of the sequence manually. When recompiled it resulted in a slightly better playback. Perhaps good enough to serve as a initial animatic? The big contributor to failure was my inability to control the constraints I placed on the axe. I had two constraints; one to Tar's hand and one to the hyena's leader's head. While they worked intially I had problems rotating the axe inbetween leaving Tar's hand and approaching the hyena's head. If I had it to do all over again I might constrain the axe to a Null and then animate that. Alternately, although not optimally, I might just manually place the axe. As it was a simple setup, I might just start this entire sequence over from scratch. But... there you have my attempt. Now it's time for someone else to post their axe throwing animation!

That's looking VERY good!

Thanks William, Interestingly enough I started to lose interest after establishing the key poses so you see my laziness on display here. I left space for an anticipatory intro and follow through at the end (the wall you speak of) as I started getting distracted by the dust effect of Tar's mace scraping along the sand (i wanted to see if I could use dust effect in A:M subtley yet effectively in the scene... didn't quite hit the mark there either but saw enough to realize it will work for me in the future if I need it.) I'm rendering out an extended sequence but already want to throw it into the trash can. I was struggling with constraints all the way. The successful parts might make a decent storyboard. I wanted to get more of a side arm swing to get some lift in the trajectory of the axe as it has quite a long way to go (as will be evidenced by the next sequence I post). Part of the issue with inbetweening is that I know what needs to be done but I haven't the patience to do it. Especially if the shot I'm working on isn't going anywhere anyway. Perhaps I should post keys until folks think it'll work and then go back and work the inbetweens? And... how do you cure someone of being lazy?

While typing my little excuse for not completing the assignment I figured out a decent approach to picking up the axe and then throwing it. It'll be a good test of one of the new features too. I'll see if it works.

Axe throw! I think this animation is big enough that you'll have to click on the image to see the animation. I know the assignment was "PICK UP AND THROW AN AXE." but my brain wasn't working well on putting those two actions into a sequence. What I'd probably opt for cinematically is two shots; the first picking up the ax (or simply a shot showing the character seeing it or reaching for it) and the second (after the cut) of throwing it.

The one thing that my current workflow lacks is a high end video editor that doesn't break the bank. Several companies may help to resolve that. Avid is on the move lately with some major purchasing of other companies and an announcement that later in 2015 a free version of Media Composer will be released. While I don't imagine the free release will meet all the esoteric requirements needed the entry point is priced to make the determination of how well the program can fit into a production pipeline and fit current needs. It is also worth noting that a company recently purchased by Avid (Orad)is known for their realtime 3D technology. Sign up to receive notification of the release and more information here: http://apps.avid.com/mediacomposerfirst/ Avid claims: Every 2015 Oscar nominee for Best Picture and Best Film Editing was edited with Media Composer. 99% of all network broadcast prime time television in North America is produced on Media Composer. Source: Avid Technology Inc., 2015. Prime Time is defined as between the hours of 8 p.m. and 11 p.m., commercial OTA National Networks Only (No PBS or Cable or Super Stations), excluding Live Sports. Note that on the music side Avid is also releasing a free version of their audio prouctiin software Pro Tools: http://connect.avid.com/ProToolsFirst-Register.html

As more and more collaborative teams hit the internet to bring their projects to life small and large services are popping up to address that need. In the past I've mentioned a few and several of those have since had significant upgrades. Shotgun (recently purchased by Autodesk) is one that gets the majority of press because they got a head start on their competition and have invested deeply in the features needed to bring projects through production. Frame.io is another of these services. Will it work well for your next project? Answer: It depends. On the low end (the space which most independent creators occupy) where a team of two or three work on a project services such as Frame.io may be well worth investigating. Frame.io's starting tier is free for 5 or fewer collaborators (although note this is not the same as 5 team members). http://support.frame.io/article/13-how-much-does-frame-io-cost There are a few getting started videos: http://support.frame.io/category/5-getting-started-videos At this time the Project Management/Approval part of the service appears to be limited to a simple toggle of a 'Completed' tab in response to comments posted by collaborators but this may be sufficient in many cases. Project/Media Management has improved significantly from the days of 'Tin Woodman of Oz' and DotProject**. A few other services that have been vying for attention that have been covered in the forum before include Shotgun, Sony Media Cloud Services, RGBNotes, and Tactic. All have their various pros and cons and associated price points. Related applications/services I haven't looked into: CineSync **While it started off with excellent potential DotProject seemed to have plateaued and hasn't been updated since 2013.