sprockets TV Commercial by Matt Campbell Greeting of Christmas Past by Gerry Mooney and Holmes Bryant! Learn to keyframe animate chains of bones. Gerald's 2024 Advent Calendar! The Snowman is coming! Realistic head model by Dan Skelton Vintage character and mo-cap animation by Joe Williamsen
sprockets
Recent Posts | Unread Content
Jump to content
Hash, Inc. - Animation:Master

Recommended Posts

Posted

Trying to get a sprite particle system set up, and can't help but think I'm missing something basic here.

 

I can't get the opacity to change over time. It's just constant. I adjust the opacity over time on the timeline, but it does nothing.

 

And is it possible to use an animated format for a sprite? .gif or .mov? Had no luck with .mov, nothing renders.

 

Thanks!

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

Hello Meow-

I just did a smoke animation where I got the sprite to fade in and out really nicely... you need to keyframe the 'over time' parameter. (See image)

 

 

AND- Quicktimes can be wonky... use a sequence like jpg or tga or png... tga is prolly the best.

wtf.jpg

Posted

Awesome, ty both! :D

Must have been messing something up with the timeline window. Works fantastic now. d^_^b

 

I'm actually REALLY happy with the result, here's a quick test render I did. Got exactly the effect I was going for.

particles_test.mov

And it takes almost no time at all to render because they're sprites. Thanks again!!

Posted

Hmm, is there a known bug with particles + "on the fly" dynamics simulation? I was doing some test renders and noticed that my dynamics had all but died - their effects were very, very muted. Tried rendering without particles/hair and they were back to normal. Now, easy enough to bypass - just simulate springs first - but is this a known issue?

 

This was also in a "shaded" movie render. I didn't try it with a full quality render.

  • Hash Fellow
Posted
Hmm, is there a known bug with particles + "on the fly" dynamics simulation? I was doing some test renders and noticed that my dynamics had all but died - their effects were very, very muted. Tried rendering without particles/hair and they were back to normal. Now, easy enough to bypass - just simulate springs first - but is this a known issue?

 

I seem to recall that we're supposed to simulate springs before rendering now, but back around v10.5 I didnt' have to. None-the-less if you candocument a case of unecpected behavior with particles present make an AMReport of it.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...