Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted October 14, 2008 Hash Fellow Posted October 14, 2008 A frame from "We're Off, We're Gone". Put on your red-blue glasses. Quote
heyvern Posted October 14, 2008 Posted October 14, 2008 Yeehaaa! I was cleaning up today and found my aviator style 3D glasses (very stylish but useless outside of the house). I did nearly put my eye out. You should be careful with those things. p.s. So, does Martin plan on a "3D" version of SO? You did hear about the movie studios investing millions in converting theaters across the country to digital 3D right? Since there won't be a ton of content right away he could get ahead of the curve. -vern Quote
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted October 15, 2008 Author Hash Fellow Posted October 15, 2008 And now, right here, on this very stage is the most sensational, inspirational, syncopational, instrumentational, 3-Dimensional A:M scene I've seen today: 2_01_80 red-blue version cross-eye 3D version Marching Band-imation by KenH Crowd-imation by PFMark Rabbit-mation and camera-mation by me Those are just quick shaded renders but you get the idea. They look best if you full-screen them. You can see what some "final" rendered frames (in 3D!) look like here. p.s. So, does Martin plan on a "3D" version of SO? Not that I know of. I'm going thru and tidying up the unfinished shots in "We're Off, We're Gone" so it can be in TWO and just decided to do the extra 10% to properly set the stereo options for the camera since I had rather envisoned the sequence for possible stereoscopic anyway. You did hear about the movie studios investing millions in converting theaters across the country to digital 3D right? Since there won't be a ton of content right away he could get ahead of the curve. I thought of that too. However, they've devised the situation to make it awkward for independents. Aside from the need to pay someone to convert your movie to the correct digital file format, they charge a "digital print fee" every time your movie is projected. It looks like the anticipated savings of not having to make a film print of your movie for theatrical showing is negated. Quote
jon Posted October 15, 2008 Posted October 15, 2008 the crosseye version is certainly trippy... but the pacing was a little too fast for me to fully appreciate the stereo effect. great job folks! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.