am_dad Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 Can anyone point me to info on this forum / help me choose appropriate processor and graphics cards for a new system? I am buying a new computer, and want it capable to run AM for my son. Am considering core duo 6700 and either one or two (sli) ATI X1900XTX. Is this overkill and waste of money? Thanks for any ideas. Quote
ssappington Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 sounds like an awesome system for a gamer- overkill for A:M, though- Quote
rickh Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 Am considering core duo 6700 and either one or two (sli) ATI X1900XTX. Is this overkill and waste of money? Thanks for any ideas. The Intel Core Duo 6700 is a brilliant processor, so I would definitely recomment it. A:M is a single process program so it doesn't make use of the two cores, but you have all that extra processing power available for rendering in the background, running Photoshop as well, etc. Get the X1900XTX if you want but it is more then A:M needs. Any modern midrange nVidia or ATI Radeon graphics card is fine. What you have to remember about these monsters like the dual X1900XTX is that they consume lots of power and require a lot of cooling. A $200 - $300 nVidia or ATI graphics card is still easly fast enough for A:M and will probably run cooler and quieter. A quiet PC is definitely appreciated when someone has to sit next to it for many hours a day. A:M only uses the graphics card acceleration to speed up the realtime wireframe and shaded rendering to the screen in the editing process. No feature of the graphics card is used in the final renders. As a result, you will get the same performance and quality in the rendering of the final movies with a dual SLI X1900 or a cheap $50 graphics card. A higher priority is to spend money on Ram (1 to 2GBytes of fast high quality RAM) and a really good screen (like a high resolution 21" LCD). Insist on Windows XP Pro operating system. Don't touch XP Home because it has crippled networking and if your son gets really interested in Animation, he will eventually need networking. Getting a dual X1900XTX sounds like you are building a super game PC and you might find it hard to keep a gaming PC "clean" enough to run A:M reliably. Richard Harrowell. Quote
am_dad Posted September 23, 2006 Author Posted September 23, 2006 Am considering core duo 6700 and either one or two (sli) ATI X1900XTX. Is this overkill and waste of money? Thanks for any ideas. The Intel Core Duo 6700 is a brilliant processor, so I would definitely recomment it. A:M is a single process program so it doesn't make use of the two cores, but you have all that extra processing power available for rendering in the background, running Photoshop as well, etc. Get the X1900XTX if you want but it is more then A:M needs. Any modern midrange nVidia or ATI Radeon graphics card is fine. What you have to remember about these monsters like the dual X1900XTX is that they consume lots of power and require a lot of cooling. A $200 - $300 nVidia or ATI graphics card is still easly fast enough for A:M and will probably run cooler and quieter. A quiet PC is definitely appreciated when someone has to sit next to it for many hours a day. A:M only uses the graphics card acceleration to speed up the realtime wireframe and shaded rendering to the screen in the editing process. No feature of the graphics card is used in the final renders. As a result, you will get the same performance and quality in the rendering of the final movies with a dual SLI X1900 or a cheap $50 graphics card. A higher priority is to spend money on Ram (1 to 2GBytes of fast high quality RAM) and a really good screen (like a high resolution 21" LCD). Insist on Windows XP Pro operating system. Don't touch XP Home because it has crippled networking and if your son gets really interested in Animation, he will eventually need networking. Getting a dual X1900XTX sounds like you are building a super game PC and you might find it hard to keep a gaming PC "clean" enough to run A:M reliably. Richard Harrowell. Thank you ssappington and Richard for your responses. Richard, please help me understand your comment on keeping a gaming pc clean enough to run A:M reliably. Based on your comments we would build a pc with fast processor, 2 gig+ fast memory, and 20-21 1600x1200 monitor and WinXP professional. Do we not want to play games on this machine if A:M is first priority? Dennis (am_dad) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.