DZ4

This was a bit rushed, but shows a rough idea of what would show up on a smartphone/tablet, I suppose. Obviously the muscle motion in the face would be time consuming, but I'm not even trying to do that for starters. Actually trying to eliminate the need for muscle motion altogether (...for starters). But she's got a new do, and about to be cloned! Like The Bangles! 4 chicks. Destiny's Child? 3 chicks. Pussycat Dolls? I don't know. Just change the faces and décor, but keep the bone structure so they can dance in sync. That's gotta be huge.

I'll post this here because my avatar still shows up here on the forum. It could go in the "head tutorial" though. Anyway, I got the ears attached to Vera's head and it's looking pretty good I think. But just before I copied the left ear that I was modeling to the right, I thought... "Don't mess this up, save a copy in this state before it all turns to trash" or "This would be a really neat addition to the head tutorial since what you put there before didn't have any ears" and "Don't share, you worked hard on that, keep it to yourself". But Vera's getting a whole new makeover to go with her new ears. The attached model is in a state where the ear(s) could still be changed, but you can see by the pictures it's easy to copy the right ear and attach to the left side of the head. The model should do most of the talking. I'm using FL Studio 12 to make some music, back to timing the bpm to fps thought. Generally making it to go in whichever direction one may want to (Android app or YouTube video). But the ears are huge! Well, no, I'm not saying... (Oh yeah, she can hear now...) As far as the app, I'm thinking just Music, Dance, Effects, Light show. Like MTV used to put out videos. Nothing more. Well a little more but not trying to turn it into a game. Maybe a way to vote on what one likes? But, I want a sustainable format, open to improvement. ie. "this is how to put a package together, stick it on the website, and see if anybody downloads it". And if nobody does, make a better one. But there's nothing to see (or hear) right now. Well maybe you can hear my WIP song! 1 bar = 4 beats, so at 90 bpm and at 12 fps, 1 beat = 0.67s = 8 frames, right? Or, at 120 bpm 1 bar = 2s, so a beat would occur every 6 frames, right? And every where in between, I mean it's perfectly simple. Like I'm trying to figure out how to model (how many times do they play the riff then hit the drums then cut the riff then repeat which part) a song, and it is apparently set up at 130 bpm, so... "which frame does the light flash on ? ... and then off ?" I think that stuff can be figured out, but when I get back to programming the app, I'm worried about getting it all to play together properly timed without a glitch. But still a work in progress... enjoy the ears for now. Vera-3.mdl Song1-B.mp3

I would pattern the orbitron after the atomic model with six (6) sensors of any sort attached to the "electrons". A magnetic charge at the nucleus of course. Also at the nucleus would be a transmitter. Locate the specific nucleus from a "land" station, download the data from the sensors. Now, electrons "supposedly" spin as well as revolve around the nucleus. Now that's some fun math and likely very naturally dictated. My guess is a Helium atom's electron doesn't spin, why, well because the moon doesn't. So starting with a Hydrogen model... you have 12 sensors attached to 2 "electrons" taking pictures or sensing data. Then you have the central station interpolating the position of the "atom" and thus the actual direction of each sensor. While the electrons spin and take "photos", it could be interpolated the actual bearing and point of each image (shot, picture, snap, whatever). The math is head-spinning but at it's root just basic sine wave/rotations/vectors. But it would give a 3D "blow-up" of a remote location. Now if that could be used to sense a sudden change in temperature and release a suppression, it could be useful in certain situations. Anyway, I am thankful for the imaginary virtual exercise to visualize something. Do you see it? It's not in metric is it?

I saw the movie Predator if that helps. Combining a heat sensor with OpenGL would sum it up. But then why stop at heat when you can click your smart watch and switch to infrared? Kthdthdthdth! And let me test it out so I can get that pesky soldier boy. Shwoowm! Friggin' booby trap he got me with. Finding a path to tinker with all OpenGL can do is the hard part. They even have code for detecting if your finger is hovering over the screen and not yet touching it. Just don't do the brainwave sensor cause then you have to listen to everyone complain. Otherwise, your imagination seems to be reaching out a bit too far. Have you seen the laser measuring tools? I mean, how does that work? "It bounces a laser beam and measures the time it takes to return" "Yeah! at the speed of light, and within a fraction of a millimeter?!" But it's just a little box. Can you take it apart and figure it out? I doubt it. Why does a laser need to be a beam? They have those cameras that take a virtual 3D image and realtors really picked up on it. I think it would take a lot of duct tape, etc. to build the prototype...somehow utilize a mini orbitron...At least there's wifi so it's not a mess of tangled cables. But the best scenario is getting "bought out" by the gov't, never to be heard from again. After an episode of The Running Man. Glad I'm just trying to figure out how to make music right now.

I noticed the models didn't move in that video, but obviously were 3D meshes with effects applied with a 'not so sure how done' background. Not that it didn't look better than A:M's Shaded View when modeling, but it seemed focused on creating a background with realistic lighting to match how the character (or gun) reflects light, with several other factors involved (understood) at the same time. Seems to me, an object (ie. model, character) is being rendered on a "layer" on top of the background with the same lighting effects applied, like green screen with lights in one location matching the other. The software looks very similar to 3DStudioMax as well, which I believe is Autodesk which would make sense as far as using layers (AutoCAD uses layers extensively to draw things on top of others for viewing clarity). 3DStudioMax was big on polygons and that's an issue when exporting objects from A:M. I think AMTex worked well for DirectX files, but there is the issue of how 5-point patches (and tying a spline into another without a control point...sorry my vocabulary has been in the attic for awhile) without showing up with gaps. Your software apparently uses a file to represent a 3D object and render it. What is the file format? Is it OpenGL which apparently doesn't have a similar format as Xfile, rather utilize a class (notso simple java file in Android) for the object? I'm not familiar with Mocap, but pre-rendered keyed frames would already have lighting applied, no? A real time engine that incorporates pre-rendered work as well as 3D models is my goal, but since things changed to Android (or Ios), the next best one would be written in Java with OpenGL ES, imho. But since we're on the A:M Forum, how does an A:M user put their models into such a program for benefit. My interpretation is that their best bet is to render a character's animations with a flat (black) background. and the surroundings would be filled in by others? Character animation, again in my humble opinion, is the hardest part of it all. It's the "content" that is so hard to find in abundance. Create a character, sure, make it dance and sing and appeal to an audience, hello? Bone rotations, Muscle motion, keyframes, timed to a soundtrack that exists in one's imagination. Although, music that is "good enough" is fairly simple, until you need to time it to the animation it's created for. I guess I'm just spinning my own wheels here, but I don't see what I want to animate until I'm hearing a good song. MTV was so influential before it became [crap]. Even though there were bad music videos, the concept adapts well to amateur animators, as in a conceivable time frame to put forth something. If there was help to throw in a background, and just "ship it out", oh and throw in the music, it would be a better approach, I think, that trying to create that masterpiece that never gets done. Sort of put what's existing to exercise. Just throw that crap you got out there... but... if it can be "fixed up" with a fantastic background? Until the best "real time engine" is at our disposal (one based on frame rate rather than max frames per second would be my approach), let's start sticking it on an app. Even if it's crap. Just to get started. You would be good at promoting such a thing, yes? Done with "Real Time Technology" by [your company name here]! Regardless. I need to make base models (without restraints) that can be adapted to share the same actions, but look different. And they need to be pretty, and worst case scenario, ready for the stripper show app. Or worse. That whole does art reflect life concept.

Is motion capture at all related to this? I remember motion capture involved taping a bunch of "points" to yourself and animating in "real time". Then Kinect came out and basically said that can be done wirelessly. I don't see anything from that video that shows anything more than a pre-rendered animation. I can see what detbear is saying. Right now, you can play an action in shaded mode and tinker with the properties, bone movement, or whatever in real time, but it's usually a mess, and the need to go back and make adjustments is still there. When you say "Real Time", it implies to me that you want to have an animated character that you can display in a format over the internet and communicate in some fashion. Like Twitter with visual, or Skype with a mask. I suppose if you're in the movie business or something similar, you would probably laugh at my naïve take on this topic, but it reminds me of Civil3D being the most biggest [bad grammar on purpose] thing to hit the Civil Engineering industry, when it's just BS. It seems there would be too many things to have to adjust in real time to make it make sense. Are you thinking of making a 1.5 hour movie in 1.5 hours? That's feasible if the plot is to take a day in the life of John Doe and make a film of it, I suppose. I think you're going to reply with an explanation that it's an editor. But I can dance better in real time by a long shot than I can actually animate it. So I'm pretty interested on anything you got.

I think she would be better off using A:M to enhance her interest in another career path. Like entymology, there is a big shortage of skeletal layouts for every insect known to mankind. Anything but thinking a college is going to teach her any more than can be learned at will with free tutorials, advice, etc. Game programming, etc. has taken a turn towards mobile devices or Xbox/PlayStation. You do not need to go to a college or university to learn how to develop for these "systems". If you do a little research, you'll find all the information you need on the world wide web. If she's going to pursue a college degree, use it in a way that gives her a career path that is in demand in the "real world". It will never take away from her interest in 'computer painting' (I just coined that...Boom!), but she could find herself very upset with life in the future trying to pursue a phantom industry, possibly getting lucking to land a job with a sign company utilizing Adobe Suite. I think my comments reflect what others were saying. It's also very hard to tell someone the reality behind their dream. I'm 43 and I still get excited about things that I think are going to make me [a way to be financially independent], but they are usually a dead-end from the start. And nobody can tell me I'm wrong. The concept of just finding a career in the game industry is worse in my opinion, because I don't believe it is actually there. Again, the tools to pursue her goals are basically free or available at low cost to pursue. A career would be better directed toward things you find in your everyday life (doctors, lawyers, accountants, engineers, etc.) and... wait... (cashiers, stockers, mechanics{should be in the upper category, sorry}, nurses...), and such. Best wishes to your daughter's future. I've noticed in my experience that having some artistic 'crap' and programming 'crap' work very well in interviews for jobs that are unrelated to the ""industry. Breaks the ice, and makes you look like someone that might be more interesting to work with. But it will end there... at the interview. Find that job, and pursue your artistic goal on your own time. If she likes football, she could model a football helmet, then use a variety of decals, then try to sell it (without the choke hold of working for a company, in which case the idea, design, and material would belong to them). etc.

You say you are looking to "rig" this model. There is definitely a basic rigging layout used for most models, etc. But it would not be out of the realm to come up with a rigging system that is a bit different, I would think. So, perhaps due to muscle motion problems and such, your particular model may work better with a new layout. But if you're using the same old ( bone setup...I'd like to see how it's done. I did my models and stuff with no constraints. When I tried to tie into existing models and stuff, it was always this target and that constraint that made it messy. I would think the model you have there would be more vocal and only need to animate when he frequently coughs.

So a digital version of the ol' Operation "board" game...I get it. Why not a Hungry Hungry Hippos app? But then...it would work better with a big square pad...with holographic projection (glasses not included:). I like the "Top Secret" approach. Don't tell anyone anything! Seriously! Let them hack it. Then you're dealing with the real McCoy. Smart. I've got a JavaScript learning book, but not sure if I should waste time with it at this point...It's like 8 years old. Oh! Battleship app! I'm sticking with the simple (ha!, that's still just so funny!...simple) app to play animations. Sort of like something that folks could just veg out and watch...as they do with TV. So it can't be crappy the content, really...considering the competition. Still, the ultimate is riding in the Millenium Falcon shooting Tie-Fighters. I just want in on the sound effects.

So lets see the model already. Really, I'm eager to see what you have come up with. Not just a big executive decision to use Unity.

Well then, we'll start learning Javascript. Or as it's called in Unity...UnityScript. ...Sucks! Not gonna do it!

Forgot to mention how warm and fuzzy I felt when you said you know me

This comes out of the SP Renderer...just to show how easy (ha!) it is to adjust numbers in order to change the dimensions and quantity of sprite sheets,,,the Renderer is basically the engine for an app. Everything else is basically long nights for disrespected programmers or something. The project doesn't pop up like it used to and that's where I became fearful that it could just disappear by means of hackers, etc. Hence, the desire to share...bla bla bla..l'm not against making money here... package com.starplayer; import javax.microedition.khronos.egl.EGLConfig; import javax.microedition.khronos.opengles.GL10; import android.opengl.GLSurfaceView.Renderer; import android.os.ConditionVariable; public class SPGameRenderer implements Renderer{ private SPButtons buttons0 = new SPButtons(); private SPProps props0 = new SPProps(); //private SPProps props1 = new SPProps(); //private SPProps props2 = new SPProps(); //private SPProps props3 = new SPProps(); //private SPProps props4 = new SPProps(); private SPDancer dancer0 = new SPDancer(); private SPDancer dancer1 = new SPDancer(); private SPDancer dancer2 = new SPDancer(); //private SPDancer dancer3 = new SPDancer(); //private SPDancer dancer4 = new SPDancer(); public static int ButtonFrame = 0; public static int PropSheet = 0; public static int PropLine = 0; public int PropFrame = 0; public static int DancerSheet = 0; public int DancerLine = 0; public int DancerFrame = 0; private long time = 0; private long time2 = 0; private void Play (GL10 gl){ //************************************************************** Props gl.glMatrixMode(GL10.GL_MODELVIEW); gl.glLoadIdentity(); gl.glPushMatrix(); gl.glScalef(1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f); gl.glTranslatef(0.0f, 0.0f, 0f); gl.glMatrixMode(GL10.GL_TEXTURE); gl.glLoadIdentity(); //flip image gl.glRotatef(180.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); gl.glTranslatef(0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f); //Props 12x12 sprite sheet 5 sheets //12fps gl.glTranslatef(PropFrame/12.0f, PropLine/12.0f, 0.0f); switch (PropSheet){ case 0: props0.draw(gl); break; //case 1: ///props1.draw(gl); //break; //case 2: //props2.draw(gl); //break; //case 3: //props3.draw(gl); //break; //case 4: //props4.draw(gl); //break; } gl.glPopMatrix(); gl.glLoadIdentity(); //*********************************************************** Dancer gl.glMatrixMode(GL10.GL_MODELVIEW); gl.glLoadIdentity(); gl.glPushMatrix(); gl.glScalef(1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f); gl.glTranslatef(0.0f, 0.0f, 0f); gl.glMatrixMode(GL10.GL_TEXTURE); gl.glLoadIdentity(); gl.glTranslatef(0.0f, 0.0f, 0f); //flip image gl.glRotatef(180.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); gl.glTranslatef(0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f); //Dancer 12x12 sprite sheet 5 sheets gl.glTranslatef(DancerFrame/12.0f, DancerLine/12.0f, 0.0f); switch (DancerSheet){ case 0: dancer0.draw(gl); break; case 1: dancer1.draw(gl); break; case 2: dancer2.draw(gl); break; case 3: //dancer3.draw(gl); break; case 4: //dancer4.draw(gl); break; } gl.glPopMatrix(); gl.glLoadIdentity(); //***************************************************************** Buttons gl.glMatrixMode(GL10.GL_MODELVIEW); gl.glLoadIdentity(); gl.glPushMatrix(); gl.glScalef(1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f); gl.glTranslatef(0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); gl.glMatrixMode(GL10.GL_TEXTURE); gl.glLoadIdentity(); //flip image gl.glRotatef(180.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); gl.glTranslatef(0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f); //gl.glTranslatef(0.0f, 0.0f, 0.1f);// Adjust z-value for draw order //Background 12x12 sprite sheet 5 sheets gl.glTranslatef(ButtonFrame/12.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); buttons0.draw(gl); //reset matrices prior to next render gl.glPopMatrix(); gl.glLoadIdentity(); //************************************************************************************************ // Update 12fps Frame Locations 5 sheets if ((System.currentTimeMillis()- time) > (1000/12)){ //PropFrame+=1; DancerFrame+=1; //if (PropFrame>=12){PropFrame=0;PropLine+=1;} //if (PropLine>=12){PropLine=0;PropSheet+=1;} //if (PropSheet>=5){PropSheet=0;} //change value (1) to # of sheets if (DancerFrame>=12){DancerFrame=0;DancerLine+=1;} if (DancerLine>=12){DancerLine=0;} //DancerSheet+=1;} //dancer sheet adjusted with L button //if (DancerSheet>=1){DancerSheet=0;} time = System.currentTimeMillis(); } // Update 4fps Props if ((System.currentTimeMillis()-time2) > (1000/4)){ PropFrame+=1; if (PropFrame>=12){PropFrame=0;} time2 = System.currentTimeMillis(); } //**************************************************// } @Override public void onDrawFrame(GL10 gl) { gl.glClear(GL10.GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT | GL10.GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT); Play(gl); gl.glEnable(GL10.GL_BLEND); //gl.glColor4f(1, 1, 1, 1); //gl.glBlendFunc(GL10.GL_ONE, GL10.GL_ONE); /* **** */ gl.glBlendFunc(GL10.GL_SRC_ALPHA,GL10.GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA); //gl.glBlendFunc(GL10.GL_SRC_COLOR, GL10.GL_SRC_COLOR); } @Override public void onSurfaceChanged(GL10 gl, int width, int height){ gl.glViewport(0, 0, width, height); gl.glMatrixMode(GL10.GL_PROJECTION); gl.glLoadIdentity(); gl.glOrthof(0f, 1f, 0f, 1f, -1f, 1f); } @Override public void onSurfaceCreated(GL10 gl, EGLConfig config){ gl.glEnable(GL10.GL_TEXTURE_2D); gl.glClearColor(0, 0, 0, 0); gl.glClearDepthf(1.0f); gl.glEnable(GL10.GL_DEPTH_TEST); //gl.glDepthFunc(GL10.GL_LEQUAL); gl.glDepthFunc(GL10.GL_ALWAYS); gl.glEnable(GL10.GL_BLEND); gl.glColor4f(1, 1, 1, 1); //gl.glBlendFunc(GL10.GL_ONE, GL10.GL_ONE); /* **** */ gl.glBlendFunc(GL10.GL_SRC_ALPHA,GL10.GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA); //gl.glBlendFunc(GL10.GL_SRC_COLOR, GL10.GL_SRC_COLOR); props0.loadTexture(gl, SPEngine.PROPS_0, SPEngine.context); //props1.loadTexture(gl, SPEngine.PROPS_1, SPEngine.context); //props2.loadTexture(gl, SPEngine.PROPS_2, SPEngine.context); //props3.loadTexture(gl, SPEngine.PROPS_3, SPEngine.context); //props4.loadTexture(gl, SPEngine.PROPS_4, SPEngine.context); dancer0.loadTexture(gl, SPEngine.DANCER_0, SPEngine.context); dancer1.loadTexture(gl, SPEngine.DANCER_1, SPEngine.context); dancer2.loadTexture(gl, SPEngine.DANCER_2, SPEngine.context); //dancer3.loadTexture(gl, SPEngine.DANCER_3, SPEngine.context); //dancer4.loadTexture(gl, SPEngine.DANCER_4, SPEngine.context); buttons0.loadTexture(gl, SPEngine.BUTTONS_0, SPEngine.context); gl.glMatrixMode(GL10.GL_MODELVIEW); gl.glLoadIdentity(); gl.glPushMatrix(); gl.glScalef(1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f); gl.glTranslatef(0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); gl.glMatrixMode(GL10.GL_TEXTURE); gl.glLoadIdentity(); //flip image gl.glRotatef(180.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); gl.glTranslatef(0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f); //gl.glTranslatef(0.0f, 0.0f, 0.1f);// Adjust z-value for draw order //Buttons 12x12 sprite sheet 5 sheets gl.glTranslatef(ButtonFrame/12.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); } public void onViewPause(ConditionVariable syncObj){ props0 = null; //props1 = null; //props2 = null; //props3 = null; //props4 = null; dancer0 = null; dancer1 = null; dancer2 = null; buttons0 = null; syncObj.open(); } } I can edit this with better direction, but someone should download Eclipse with Android Developer Tools and get things up and running with a basic 1"how-to" first, ...IMHO> What is Love is on the radio.ll ... got to go!

Don't forget to say it's on Google Play as monoboom starplayer if you do a quick search for the app in the media category. And of course the content was done in about 4 hours where as the program took about 2 years. I suppose there has to be a business plan, etc. behind something of this sort, which sometimes befuddles me as it's done and ready to test out (play with), and develop further. But the business plan is basically MTV on the phone, with animation. Old songs, new songs, real video layered with computer graphics. It's the basic app to get off the ground and all apps share the basic Android programming behind it (well Android apps as far as I know but Ios is probably similar). I've also noticed that some development tools can be just as hard to use once one gets into scripting in order to make a unique app, yet they will charge 25% if the app gains popularity. Either way, I hope we can play with it soon. It might be fun to convert to web pages as well.

Games are for kids (well, adults too), but intended to open a door. I think the "game" is getting downloads, ie. attention. Unity takes 25% once you break through that barrier. I don't understand why any investment type would contact you for "game" development unless they were more interested in the animation... ...and Point 5. You're about to lose all of the development I've done, while you try to find an easy way to make games via some development tool (written in C++). I'm losing the ability to restore my project in Eclipse,. ie. It;s about to disappear and hackers have all of the information and work I put into it. I'm being pushed out. That's how it goes.

I just need to be able to declare bankruptcy, let the car get repo'd, and then I'm thinking Colorodo or Washington St. maybe DC for that matter. Done!

Dorm room, food card, maybe $200/wk and they can have my program and me. Make it for 4 years, and we'll make whatever they want happen. Imagine all the students that want to learn to program for Android and OpenGL yet I don't believe that's in a typical Computer Science education. Plus Android could lead to programming for Air Force type of devices. Java can be put into a watch or any thing that uses Machine Language I do believe. It's not just smartphones and games. But then again, it's a game just to get something going. But if it has to be a "game" game, I liked Gorf, Phoenix, Space Castle (?), and Astro Fighter. I think quick fun is actually what people want rather than a complex strategy game on a smartphone. You mentioned Open Source, which I like. But the point is still to see who can make money off of it. Android and OpenGL, Eclipse with Android Tools...all free. Google's free! They just want to see something pop up, I think. Then they come knocking, I would suppose. I just have not seen a lot of people running into some of the development issues involved with getting an app to work. Then I don't know if they try to respond or get hacked out in between. Sort of like this forum. I started with 2-3 beginner books, then finally used Practical Android 4 Games. Also played with Pro OpenGL ES for Android for 3D (made a spinning sphere!). So those are resources that will show what goes into getting set up (although the second one there assumes you already know how to set up Eclipse/Java Virtual Machine/ etc.. I propose to make the Starplayer (aka starplayer) a downloadable project that once you install Eclipse, click here and see it all set up. Then switch the sprite sheets and music and Bam! It's still called starplayer! Ha! Maybe you could pop it on Google Play, but at that point, we need to involve other people, perhaps. All fun though. Again, be prepared for a game that doesn't make it in the market. I know many here have probably thought they had it and got excited only to wonder if aliens actually do run this planet, and many other possibilities as to why nobody noticed. Pocket Physics has like 100,000 downloads and it's just a copy of a Physics book inside cover. That's not exactly the type of educational experience I think they're looking for.

Well, I'm still waiting for my Kyocera Event to warm up so I can download Clash of Clans and see what it's all about... I do have to do away with the jokes in the meantime...like how Clash of Cans could compete with Game of Thrones in an environment that predates plastic for distribution requiring the utilization of Big Jugs...but that's off topic...but not really considering the significance of promoting the app once it's done. Regardless of who contacted you about developing such a project, you will end up trying to make a profit, yet few games make a profit,,, Your strength is in animation. "Game" can be a buzzword for an app or program, actually real games are best done in an arcade, but after that a PC, then XBOX, Nintendo, etc. An app for a phone needs simplicity, tap and go. Genius behind Flappy Bird, yet how much gaming input does one put into Angry Birds? Not much, pull and watch...ie. watch the animation. So, I offer the opportunity to use your skills to instantly get your hands wet on the promotion of an app so once you get your game done you are not looking like fools. And! you get to learn the basics of any app that will ever be built on Android in the foreseeable future! Plus! you can convert the Java written code to a website or flyable drone for that matter (possibly a watch, tv, clock, or any possible device for that matter as the Java Virtual Machine is as close to machine language as you're ever going to get). But as far as this idea goes: why not develop an XBOX game instead? What purpose in making a game? //Don't waste any kids time thinking they will ever make a living developing a game. //but knowing how to program something useful for say the Air Force may have educational promotional purposes T^hen again, multi-layered TV! It's sitting right there dammit! And you could make your own damn device, just order the screen and processor on Alibaba you !!!, ugh! No then you'll be a threat to the same people you think are providing a path to profit, eh? Learning JavaScript, you might land a cool website developer job, but I used Website Builder from GoDadday so good luck with that experience. Why did I need to learn Calculus, Physics, Chemistry, etc. to obtain an engineering degree? Hmm...? Never used any of those things, just my construction experience, so... Try Balloon Escape to track the progress of a Unity developed "game". Otherwise, Google+ forums is another great way to find out that you are in a vacuum of World Wide Web of Space where nobody hears you! I'm on OpenGL ES forum, and some other forums... Eclipse is the tool you would likely start with. I can give you the project I developed which has all the troubles solved that one would incur developing things from a "native/naive" way. You may need to download the Java Virtual Machine and it may take all day... You could also go with Microsoft's XNA. I'm sure they're looking for newbies!

Well, I'd still throw it in there as part of the package. It works. You can download it on Google Play for Android...monoboom starplayer Space Dancing. And yeah, it was a lot of work, with a lot of seemingly unsolveable problems along the way. One still needs to learn a scripting language to utilize Unity from what I've seen. I think Ios is Objective C rather that C++. I think Objective C and C# (Microsoft) were created to compete with the capabilities of Java. It's very difficult to get any attention on the marketplace, so I think that's the main obstacle. I still haven't gotten any downloads by just putting it out there, which is fine for now as I haven't been able to make the animation as good as I'd like yet. But it has interactivity (buttons!), and the basics set up. I thought it'd be fun to put out animations with it like music videos. Either update the same app, or have multiple apps. What is the basic game idea? You mentioned Game of Thrones which I've seen maybe 3 commercials on TV just tonight. The hot girl with a specially molded body uniform, you need to compete with that.

Also, Android isn't just games. I'm a bit mystified as how everyone thinks games are where it's at. Wouldn't you prefer to target media? And put an animation into an instant app? Rather than some dumb game? I kind of got my fill of games with Gorf and Asteroids. I don't need a game on my little device. I liked Tron 2.0 but wouldn't play it on anything but a PC. Games are for XBOX, Nintendo, I would think. But a cool video, a hot news feed, a trailer...

I haven't used Unity yet, or Game Salad, etc. but I think there is one underlying concept here...and correct me if I'm mistaken. Those software packages try to simplify the (intimidating, I suppose) process of using the actual programming languages (such as Java, Objective C) and OpenGL. So, you end up with a middle party between your application and the actual distributors like Google Play. You would simply be a minion of Unity and at their mercy. Now, for an educational purpose, why not get to the roots of it all and not jump on a tool that would limit the potential, as a company such as Unity cares about their bottom line more than your project, and you owe them for using their software to develop your project and all you learned was how to use Unity...and they can cut you off. I've tried to garner attention of any sort to utilize a basic application that could be used to get started. Perhaps I have been unclear about the intention. But the app works ie. the code is good. It shows an advertisement. It's on Google Play with Analytics. It can quickly be changed to show different animations without any knowledge from an artist about coding so long as there is assistance from someone that does know how to swap files into a folder, it is in the simplest state possible, it is written in Java so would be cross-platform to just about anything (as I understand, not entirely familiar about the Java Virtual Machine), it has direct access to OpenGL ES 1.0 so unlimited potential, it doesn't require a third party development software self-interest, it has a cool name, and more. Now just for fact that it could be used for animations right away I would think would be a sale for A:M. It can be developed into anything you want, but I just can't bring myself to change it at this point except to adjust frame rates, time length, and content...things that I could show a high school freshman (actually younger than that considering it's not as hard as algebra) how to adjust in minutes. But very true that collision detection and other things are tremendous obstacles to overcome and utilizing Unity may make those things simpler. But! You'll never get to Game of Thrones going that route. You'll be hit by some sort of magic and be thwarted, I'm sure. But, I'm sure it would be possible to find help with turning starplayer into what you want. And at the same time, have fun, and make media such as music videos, figure out how to stream sprite sheets so it runs like a tv, play with the same tools used for special effects, etc. Once again, it's using the raw tools and not pushing a software kit on those that take interest in the future. I just need to make a living. And my LinkedIn photo is terrible, but I can't afford a professional photographer. Civil Engineering has not been good to me. And you can have the monoboom name, I had .com long ago, now just .co, .info, .org, .mobi, but all for nothing. Not a penny made from any of this stuff.

If a game could be done with pre-rendered graphics, I think it would great for A:M. The only game I can think of like that is Dragon's Lair (then Space Ace). But the delay in turning, or upsetting a zombie to the point he gets out and eats you sounds like it could utilize pre-rendered graphics. I would think the advantage would be better visual and more storyline. Yet, it would be a fine line between coming off as a bad game or a bad animation. I haven't gotten into Unity yet, but wrote a program that could get things started. I couldn't think of a game idea, so decided I'd leave it for an animation/video player as plenty of people watch movies and TV. I think in one of the zombie movies, the zombies went to the mall because that's all they used to do anyway, so I think the idea is feasible that a zombie would just keep driving a cab because that's what he used to do, but has a shorter temper (no, just less patience with people, same urge to mess them up when annoying, ie. less inhibition). Point being getting to the airport to spread a vaccine? But putting together a single game based on the idea is risky, I would wonder if there aren't several (like 50) ideas that could use the same program with minor variations to create many games.

regardless, it's a matter of rendering to an image sequence rather than a preformatted video format, same as a camera. Why snap photos at a 10fps image sequence unless you want to put it on...well...And why the 12fps .raw footage gap? And why not just go straight from camera to app at 12fps, I dunno! But what is the one second increment was the question!

Right.. I see you've got some link to Unity. I have no problem or competitive conflict with Unity (really, who am I?!), but what has come from that? They make making games easy if I'm not mistaken. But I have no motivation to make a game. I don't see anyone here wanting to pursue that either,,,unless they could make money there. "Depending on what you want to do" ... Picture the earth and a baseball bat...now...nobody gets hurt!, but...at min 6fps on duh smirtfone, u git enterdainment! Blowin tings up and such on StarPlayer. Just fur fun! Now how do we make that happen? You could go with a 30/15/10/5 fps format as well, but it wouldn't gel well with music (in the future). Or, like me, you could say f#$%@$%& it!

Here's a 2 second video that loops well. And .mov's you quickly. I think it's at 30fps, yet has a big file size. I like your video, it has the character animation direction I like, like Christina Aguilara singing "Let's get dirty!".